From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm: fix NULL NODE_DATA dereference for memoryless nodes on boot
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 13:18:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZw3caxKhZtmJCUj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260222115702.3659-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Sun, Feb 22, 2026 at 07:57:02PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Commit d49004c5f0c1 ("arch, mm: consolidate initialization of nodes,
> zones and memory map") moved free_area_init() from setup_arch() to
> mm_core_init_early(), which runs after setup_arch() returns.
>
> This changed the ordering relative to init_cpu_to_node() on x86. Before
> the commit, free_area_init() ran during paging_init() (called from
> setup_arch()) *before* init_cpu_to_node(). After the commit, it runs
> *after* init_cpu_to_node().
>
> On machines with memoryless NUMA nodes (e.g., node 0 has CPUs but no
> memory), this causes a NULL pointer dereference:
>
> 1. numa_register_nodes() skips memoryless nodes: no alloc_node_data()
> and no node_set_online() for them.
> 2. init_cpu_to_node() sets memoryless nodes online (they have CPUs)
> but does not allocate NODE_DATA.
> 3. free_area_init() checks "if (!node_online(nid))" to decide whether
> to call alloc_offline_node_data(). Since the memoryless node is now
> online, the allocation is skipped, leaving NODE_DATA(nid) == NULL.
> 4. The immediate "pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid)" dereferences NULL.
>
> The crash happens before console_init(), so no output is visible without
> earlyprintk. With earlyprintk enabled, the following panic is observed:
>
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000000002a1e0
> Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> RIP: 0010:free_area_init_node+0x3a/0x540
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> free_area_init+0x331/0x4e0
> start_kernel+0x69/0x4a0
> x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30
> x86_64_start_kernel+0x125/0x130
> common_startup_64+0x13e/0x148
> </TASK>
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
>
> Fix this by checking "if (!NODE_DATA(nid))" instead of
> "if (!node_online(nid))". This directly tests whether the per-node data
> structure needs to be allocated, regardless of the node's online status.
> This change is also safe for non-x86 architectures as they all allocate
> NODE_DATA for every node including memoryless ones, so the check simply
> evaluates to false with no change in behavior.
This kinda means that x86 does something odd, but that's a matter for
additional rework and audit of node allocations.
> Fixes: d49004c5f0c1 ("arch, mm: consolidate initialization of nodes, zones and memory map")
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> V2:
> - add commit log for non-x86 arch
> - add comment for code change
>
> mm/mm_init.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> index 61d983d23f55..df34797691bd 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -1896,7 +1896,11 @@ static void __init free_area_init(void)
> for_each_node(nid) {
> pg_data_t *pgdat;
>
> - if (!node_online(nid))
> + /*
> + * If an architecture has not allocated node data for
> + * this node, presume the node is memoryless or offline.
> + */
> + if (!NODE_DATA(nid))
> alloc_offline_node_data(nid);
>
> pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> --
> 2.53.0
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-22 11:57 Ming Lei
2026-02-23 11:18 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZw3caxKhZtmJCUj@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox