linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,  Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 15:27:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZjiHt7h2z3Ye81_@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZf9RsIUh8ARg_RP@xhacker>

On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 02:20:54PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 02:07:57PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:39:44AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > It turns out the generic disable/enable irq this_cpu_cmpxchg
> > > implementation is faster than LL/SC or lse implementation. Remove
> > > HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL for better performance on arm64.
> > > 
> > > Tested on Quad 1.9GHZ CA55 platform:
> > > average mod_node_page_state() cost decreases from 167ns to 103ns
> > > the spawn (30 duration) benchmark in unixbench is improved
> > > from 147494 lps to 150561 lps, improved by 2.1%
> > > 
> > > Tested on Quad 2.1GHZ CA73 platform:
> > > average mod_node_page_state() cost decreases from 113ns to 85ns
> > > the spawn (30 duration) benchmark in unixbench is improved
> > > from 209844 lps to 212581 lps, improved by 1.3%
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Please note that mod_node_page_state() can be called in NMI context and
> > generic disable/enable irq are not safe against NMIs (newer arm arch supports
> > NMI).
> 
> hmm, interesting...
> 
> fgrep HAVE_NMI arch/*/Kconfig
> then
> fgrep HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL arch/*/Kconfig
> 
> shows that only x86, arm64, s390 and loongarch are safe, while arm,
> powerpc and mips enable HAVE_NMI but missing HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL, so
> they rely on generic generic disable/enable irq version, so you imply
> that these three arch are not safe considering mod_node_page_state()
> in NMI context.

Yes it seems like it. For memcg stats, we use ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG and
ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS config options to correctly handle the updates
from NMI context. Maybe we need something similar for vmstat as well.

So arm, powerpc and mips does not have ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS but
powerpc does have ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG and arm has
it for CPU_V7, CPU_V7M & CPU_V6K models.

I wonder if we need to add complexity for these archs.


      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-20 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-15  3:39 Jisheng Zhang
2026-02-16 10:59 ` Dev Jain
2026-02-16 11:00 ` Will Deacon
2026-02-16 15:29   ` Dev Jain
2026-02-17 13:53     ` Catalin Marinas
2026-02-17 15:00       ` Will Deacon
2026-02-17 16:48         ` Catalin Marinas
2026-02-18  4:01           ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18  9:29             ` Catalin Marinas
2026-02-17 17:19     ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2026-02-20  6:14     ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-02-18 22:07 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-20  6:20   ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-02-20 23:27     ` Shakeel Butt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZjiHt7h2z3Ye81_@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox