linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, apopple@nvidia.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@google.com,
	byungchul@sk.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, david@kernel.org,
	eperezma@redhat.com, gourry@gourry.net, jasowang@redhat.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
	mst@redhat.com, rppt@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, rakie.kim@sk.com,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	surenb@google.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	vbabka@suse.cz, weixugc@google.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
	ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, yuanchu@google.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/mempolicy: track page allocations per mempolicy
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:26:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZLUm95Y-dKkdBWI@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eca7a8f9-173d-4cb0-93b3-df082b8d0c08@gmail.com>

On Thu 12-02-26 13:22:56, JP Kobryn wrote:
> On 2/11/26 11:29 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 11-02-26 20:51:08, JP Kobryn wrote:
> > > It would be useful to see a breakdown of allocations to understand which
> > > NUMA policies are driving them. For example, when investigating memory
> > > pressure, having policy-specific counts could show that allocations were
> > > bound to the affected node (via MPOL_BIND).
> > > 
> > > Add per-policy page allocation counters as new node stat items. These
> > > counters can provide correlation between a mempolicy and pressure on a
> > > given node.
> > 
> > Could you be more specific how exactly do you plan to use those
> > counters?
> 
> Yes. Patch 2 allows us to find which nodes are undergoing reclaim. Once
> we identify the affected node(s), the new mpol counters (this patch)
> allow us correlate the pressure to the mempolicy driving it.

I would appreciate somehow more specificity. You are adding counters
that are not really easy to drop once they are in. Sure we have
precedence of dropping some counters in the past so this is not as hard
as usual userspace APIs but still...

How exactly do you tolerate mempolicy allocations to specific nodes?
While MPOL_MBIND is quite straightforward others are less so.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-16  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-12  4:51 [PATCH 0/2] improve per-node allocation and reclaim visibility JP Kobryn
2026-02-12  4:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mempolicy: track page allocations per mempolicy JP Kobryn
2026-02-12  7:29   ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-12 21:22     ` JP Kobryn
2026-02-16  8:26       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2026-02-16 17:50         ` JP Kobryn (Meta)
2026-02-16 21:07           ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-17  7:48             ` JP Kobryn (Meta)
2026-02-17 12:37               ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-17 18:19                 ` JP Kobryn (Meta)
2026-02-17 18:52                   ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-12 15:07   ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-12 21:23     ` JP Kobryn
2026-02-12 15:24   ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-12 21:25     ` JP Kobryn
2026-02-13  8:54       ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-13 19:56         ` JP Kobryn (Meta)
2026-02-18  4:25   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-12  4:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: move pgscan and pgsteal to node stats JP Kobryn
2026-02-12  7:08   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-12 21:23     ` JP Kobryn
2026-02-12  7:29   ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-12 21:20     ` JP Kobryn
2026-02-12  4:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] improve per-node allocation and reclaim visibility Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-12 21:22   ` JP Kobryn
2026-02-12 21:53     ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-12 18:08 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZLUm95Y-dKkdBWI@tiehlicka \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox