From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: memfd_luo: always make all folios uptodate
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 10:53:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ64ikDtz8tF_rFU@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223173931.2221759-2-pratyush@kernel.org>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 06:39:28PM +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> From: "Pratyush Yadav (Google)" <pratyush@kernel.org>
>
> When a folio is added to a shmem file via fallocate, it is not zeroed on
> allocation. This is done as a performance optimization since it is
> possible the folio will never end up being used at all. When the folio
> is used, shmem checks for the uptodate flag, and if absent, zeroes the
> folio (and sets the flag) before returning to user.
>
> With LUO, the flags of each folio are saved at preserve time. It is
> possible to have a memfd with some folios fallocated but not uptodate.
> For those, the uptodate flag doesn't get saved. The folios might later
> end up being used and become uptodate. They would get passed to the next
> kernel via KHO correctly since they did get preserved. But they won't
> have the MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_UPTODATE flag.
>
> This means that when the memfd is retrieved, the folios will be added to
> the shmem file without the uptodate flag. They will be zeroed before
> first use, losing the data in those folios.
>
> Since we take a big performance hit in allocating, zeroing, and pinning
> all folios at prepare time anyway, take some more and zero all
> non-uptodate ones too.
>
> Later when there is a stronger need to make prepare faster, this can be
> optimized.
>
> To avoid racing with another uptodate operation, take the folio lock.
>
> Fixes: b3749f174d68 ("mm: memfd_luo: allow preserving memfd")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav (Google) <pratyush@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/memfd_luo.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memfd_luo.c b/mm/memfd_luo.c
> index a34fccc23b6a..ccbf1337f650 100644
> --- a/mm/memfd_luo.c
> +++ b/mm/memfd_luo.c
> @@ -152,10 +152,31 @@ static int memfd_luo_preserve_folios(struct file *file,
> if (err)
> goto err_unpreserve;
>
> + folio_lock(folio);
> +
> if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
> flags |= MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_DIRTY;
> - if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> - flags |= MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_UPTODATE;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the folio is not uptodate, it was fallocated but never
> + * used. Saving this flag at prepare() doesn't work since it
> + * might change later when someone uses the folio.
> + *
> + * Since we have taken the performance penalty of allocating,
> + * zeroing, and pinning all the folios in the holes, take a bit
> + * more and zero all non-uptodate folios too.
> + *
> + * NOTE: For someone looking to improve preserve performance,
> + * this is a good place to look.
I'd add a larger comment above memfd_luo_preserve_folios() that says that
it allocates, pins etc and fold the last two paragraphs of this comment
there.
> + */
> + if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> + folio_zero_range(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
> + flush_dcache_folio(folio);
> + folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + }
> + flags |= MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_UPTODATE;
> +
> + folio_unlock(folio);
>
> pfolio->pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
> pfolio->flags = flags;
> --
> 2.53.0.371.g1d285c8824-goog
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-25 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 17:39 [PATCH 0/2] mm: memfd_luo: fixes for folio flag preservation Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-23 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: memfd_luo: always make all folios uptodate Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-25 8:53 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-02-23 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: memfd_luo: always dirty all folios Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-25 8:58 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZ64ikDtz8tF_rFU@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox