linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kaiyang Zhao <kaiyang2@cs.cmu.edu>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] mm/memcontrol: Make memcg limits tier-aware
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:03:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ4EL6IlaSi0KjT6@localhost.localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZ3ysV-k1UisnPRG@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>

On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 01:49:21PM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > Is this typical in real life configurations?
> > 
> > I would say so. I think that the two examples above are realistic
> > scenarios that cloud providers and hyperscalers might face on tiered systems.
> > 
> 
> The answer is unequivocally yes.
> 
> Lacking tier-awareness is actually a huge blocker for deploying mixed
> workloads on large, dense memory systems with multiple tiers (2+).

Hello! I'm the author of the RFC in 2024. Just want to add that we've
recently released a preprint paper on arXiv that includes case studies
with a few of Meta's production workloads using a prototype version of
the patches.

The results confirmed that co-colocated workloads can have working set
sizes exceeding the limited top-tier memory capacity given today's
server memory shapes and workload stacking settings, causing contention
of top-tier memory. Workloads see significant variations in tail
latency and throughput depending on the share of top-tier tier memory
they get, which this patch set will alleviate.

Best,
Kaiyang

[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.08800


      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-24 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23 22:38 Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm/memory-tiers: Introduce tier-aware memcg limit sysfs Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm/page_counter: Introduce tiered memory awareness to page_counter Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm/memory-tiers, memcontrol: Introduce toptier capacity updates Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] mm/memcontrol: Charge and uncharge from toptier Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] mm/memcontrol, page_counter: Make memory.low tier-aware Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] mm/memcontrol: Make memory.high tier-aware Joshua Hahn
2026-02-24 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] mm/memcontrol: Make memcg limits tier-aware Michal Hocko
2026-02-24 16:13   ` Joshua Hahn
2026-02-24 18:49     ` Gregory Price
2026-02-24 20:03       ` Kaiyang Zhao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZ4EL6IlaSi0KjT6@localhost.localhost \
    --to=kaiyang2@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox