From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
"Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
zkabelac@redhat.com, Matthew Sakai <msakai@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: allow __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL in vmalloc
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 16:51:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ3JB5Xm3SCmJW95@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZ3HaVuIA4Ezu1uY@tiehlicka>
On Tue 24-02-26 16:44:43, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 24-02-26 16:38:01, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
[...]
> > I do not have a strong opinion about workaround you noted. Maybe Mikulas
> > can switch to NOWAIT flag instead.
>
> using NOWAIT for the full vmalloc allocation would be just too easy to
> fail under moderate memory pressure.
>
> The real question is whether we want to provide some sort of backoff
> early but not way too easily allocation semantic for vmalloc. If yes we
> need to get creative in the vmalloc internals rather than expect callers
> to be working around that on their side. History has proven that this
> just leads to tech. dept and more work later on.
Just to make sure we are on the same page I mean something like this
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 61caa55a4402..791366fe44e2 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -3798,6 +3798,8 @@ static void defer_vm_area_cleanup(struct vm_struct *area)
* non-blocking (no __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) - memalloc_noreclaim_save()
* GFP_NOFS - memalloc_nofs_save()
* GFP_NOIO - memalloc_noio_save()
+ * __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, __GFP_NORETRY - memalloc_noreclaim_save() to prevent
+ * OOMs
*
* Returns a flag cookie to pair with restore.
*/
@@ -3806,7 +3808,7 @@ memalloc_apply_gfp_scope(gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
unsigned int flags = 0;
- if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask))
+ if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask) || (gfp_mask & (__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL|__GFP_NORETRY)))
flags = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
else if ((gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS | __GFP_IO)) == __GFP_IO)
flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
@@ -3940,7 +3942,8 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
* GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT. Xfs uses __GFP_NOLOCKDEP.
*/
#define GFP_VMALLOC_SUPPORTED (GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_NOWAIT |\
- __GFP_NOFAIL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NORETRY |\
+ __GFP_NOFAIL | __GFP_ZERO | |\
+ __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |\
GFP_NOFS | GFP_NOIO | GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT |\
GFP_USER | __GFP_NOLOCKDEP)
@@ -3971,12 +3974,15 @@ static gfp_t vmalloc_fix_flags(gfp_t flags)
* virtual range with protection @prot.
*
* Supported GFP classes: %GFP_KERNEL, %GFP_ATOMIC, %GFP_NOWAIT,
- * %GFP_NOFS and %GFP_NOIO. Zone modifiers are not supported.
+ * %__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, %__GFP_NORETRY, %GFP_NOFS and %GFP_NOIO.
+ * Zone modifiers are not supported.
* Please note %GFP_ATOMIC and %GFP_NOWAIT are supported only
* by __vmalloc().
*
- * Retry modifiers: only %__GFP_NOFAIL is supported; %__GFP_NORETRY
- * and %__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL are not supported.
+ * Retry modifiers: only %__GFP_NOFAIL is fully supported;
+ * %__GFP_NORETRY and %__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL are supported with limitation,
+ * i.e. page tables are allocated with NOWAIT semantic so they might fail
+ * under moderate memory pressure.
*
* %__GFP_NOWARN can be used to suppress failure messages.
*
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-12 16:33 Mikulas Patocka
2026-02-21 1:19 ` SeongJae Park
2026-02-23 5:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2026-02-23 19:02 ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2026-02-23 19:25 ` Mikulas Patocka
2026-02-23 20:07 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-02-23 22:08 ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-24 11:39 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-02-24 12:22 ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-24 14:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-24 14:22 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-24 14:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-24 14:34 ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-24 15:38 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-02-24 15:44 ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-24 15:51 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2026-02-24 16:07 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZ3JB5Xm3SCmJW95@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=msakai@redhat.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox