From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: David Wang <00107082@163.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.com>,
vbabka@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [7.0-rc1] codetag: kernel warning "alloc_tag was not set" during boot
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 23:26:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ21CP0d-RRAjUCX@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZ2yrEz2ZVggT7UL@hyeyoo>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 11:16:12PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
> Just sharing updates on this before going to bed...
>
> I was able to reproduce it on my machine I have a working fix
> (nowhere close to upstream quality, though)
>
> The reason why we're seeing "alloc_tag not was set" is
> because SLUB allocates empty sheaves for kmalloc
> with __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT and it doesn't teach memory profiling
> how to handle this when such sheaves are freed.
>
> When __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT is used in alloc_slab_obj_exts(), it later
> avoids this "alloc_tag was not set" warning by marking alloc_tags
> empty in free_slab_obj_exts(), just before freeing obj_exts.
>
> And we don't handle this when allocating freeing sheaves
> that were allocated with __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT.
>
> Passing __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT skips 1) allocation of obj_exts,
> and 2) alloc_tag_add() even when obj_exts is already allocated,
> and this confuses memory profiling later.
>
> I'm adding the fix I have now. (I guess Suren might have some preference
> on how to solve it though)
>
> 1. mark obj_exts allocation failure when slab has no obj_exts and
> gfp flag has __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT, so that a later obj_exts allocation
> will mark alloc_tags empty.
>
> 2. Set alloc_tag when obj_exts is allocated available,
> even when __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT is set.
>
> Because it's already allocated, we don't have to worry about
> recursive allocation.
Wait, isn't it much simpler to just do mark_objexts_empty(sheaf);
just before freeing sheaves, if s->flags has SLAB_KMALLOC?
/me goes to bed anyway
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 15:51 David Wang
2026-02-23 17:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-23 18:34 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-02-24 1:56 ` David Wang
2026-02-24 2:15 ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-24 2:28 ` David Wang
2026-02-24 7:07 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-02-24 11:15 ` David Wang
2026-02-24 14:16 ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-24 14:26 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2026-02-24 16:15 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-02-24 16:56 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZ21CP0d-RRAjUCX@hyeyoo \
--to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=00107082@163.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox