linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	 roman.gushchin@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	david@kernel.org,  lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	harry.yoo@oracle.com, yosry.ahmed@linux.dev,
	 imran.f.khan@oracle.com, kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com,
	axelrasmussen@google.com,  yuanchu@google.com,
	weixugc@google.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com, mkoutny@suse.com,
	 akpm@linux-foundation.org, hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com,
	apais@linux.microsoft.com,  lance.yang@linux.dev, bhe@redhat.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	 Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 30/31] mm: memcontrol: eliminate the problem of dying memory cgroup for LRU folios
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 09:53:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYoezZdqL_AofUgP@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a0e4ae2-457b-4d16-a7b9-7372fd665337@linux.dev>

On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 11:49:43AM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/8/26 6:25 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 05:01:49PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> > > From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> > > 
> > > Now that everything is set up, switch folio->memcg_data pointers to
> > > objcgs, update the accessors, and execute reparenting on cgroup death.
> > > 
> > > Finally, folio->memcg_data of LRU folios and kmem folios will always
> > > point to an object cgroup pointer. The folio->memcg_data of slab
> > > folios will point to an vector of object cgroups.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> > >   /*
> > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > index e7d4e4ff411b6..0e0efaa511d3d 100644
> > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > @@ -247,11 +247,25 @@ static inline void reparent_state_local(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgr
> > >   static inline void reparent_locks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *parent)
> > >   {
> > > +	int nid, nest = 0;
> > > +
> > >   	spin_lock_irq(&objcg_lock);
> > > +	for_each_node(nid) {
> > > +		spin_lock_nested(&mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg,
> > > +				 NODE_DATA(nid))->lru_lock, nest++);
> > > +		spin_lock_nested(&mem_cgroup_lruvec(parent,
> > > +				 NODE_DATA(nid))->lru_lock, nest++);
> > 
> > Is there a reason to acquire locks for all the node together? Why not do
> > the for_each_node(nid) in memcg_reparent_objcgs() and then reparent the
> > LRUs for each node one by one and taking and releasing lock
> > individually. Though the lock for the offlining memcg might not be
> 
> To do this, we first need to convert objcg from per-memcg to per-memcg
> per-node. In this way, we can hold the lru lock and objcg lock for
> each node to reparent the folio and the corresponding objcg together.

Oh we want reparenting of both objcg and folio atomic. Let's add a
comment here with the explanation.



  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-09 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-05  8:54 [PATCH v4 00/31] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  8:54 ` [PATCH v4 01/31] mm: memcontrol: remove dead code of checking parent memory cgroup Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  8:54 ` [PATCH v4 02/31] mm: workingset: use folio_lruvec() in workingset_refault() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  8:54 ` [PATCH v4 03/31] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its variants Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  8:54 ` [PATCH v4 04/31] mm: vmscan: prepare for the refactoring the move_folios_to_lru() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  8:54 ` [PATCH v4 05/31] mm: vmscan: refactor move_folios_to_lru() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  8:54 ` [PATCH v4 06/31] mm: memcontrol: allocate object cgroup for non-kmem case Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  8:54 ` [PATCH v4 07/31] mm: memcontrol: return root object cgroup for root memory cgroup Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/31] mm: memcontrol: prevent memory cgroup release in get_mem_cgroup_from_folio() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/31] buffer: prevent memory cgroup release in folio_alloc_buffers() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/31] writeback: prevent memory cgroup release in writeback module Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 11/31] mm: memcontrol: prevent memory cgroup release in count_memcg_folio_events() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 12/31] mm: page_io: prevent memory cgroup release in page_io module Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 13/31] mm: migrate: prevent memory cgroup release in folio_migrate_mapping() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 14/31] mm: mglru: prevent memory cgroup release in mglru Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/31] mm: memcontrol: prevent memory cgroup release in mem_cgroup_swap_full() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 16/31] mm: workingset: prevent memory cgroup release in lru_gen_eviction() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 17/31] mm: thp: prevent memory cgroup release in folio_split_queue_lock{_irqsave}() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 18/31] mm: zswap: prevent memory cgroup release in zswap_compress() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 19/31] mm: workingset: prevent lruvec release in workingset_refault() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 20/31] mm: zswap: prevent lruvec release in zswap_folio_swapin() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 21/31] mm: swap: prevent lruvec release in lru_gen_clear_refs() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 22/31] mm: workingset: prevent lruvec release in workingset_activation() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 23/31] mm: do not open-code lruvec lock Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 24/31] mm: memcontrol: prepare for reparenting LRU pages for " Qi Zheng
2026-02-05 15:02   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-05 15:02   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-06  6:13     ` Qi Zheng
2026-02-06 23:34       ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 25/31] mm: vmscan: prepare for reparenting traditional LRU folios Qi Zheng
2026-02-07  1:28   ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 26/31] mm: vmscan: prepare for reparenting MGLRU folios Qi Zheng
2026-02-12  8:46   ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-15  7:28     ` Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 27/31] mm: memcontrol: refactor memcg_reparent_objcgs() Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 28/31] mm: workingset: use lruvec_lru_size() to get the number of lru pages Qi Zheng
2026-02-07  1:48   ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-07  3:59   ` Muchun Song
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 29/31] mm: memcontrol: prepare for reparenting non-hierarchical stats Qi Zheng
2026-02-07  2:19   ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-10  6:47     ` Qi Zheng
2026-02-11  0:38       ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 30/31] mm: memcontrol: eliminate the problem of dying memory cgroup for LRU folios Qi Zheng
2026-02-07 19:59   ` Usama Arif
2026-02-07 22:25   ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-09  3:49     ` Qi Zheng
2026-02-09 17:53       ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-02-10  3:11         ` Qi Zheng
2026-02-05  9:01 ` [PATCH v4 31/31] mm: lru: add VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO to lru maintenance helpers Qi Zheng
2026-02-07 22:26   ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aYoezZdqL_AofUgP@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apais@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox