Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] mm, swap: implement helpers for reserving data in the swap table

[YoungJun Park <youngjun.park@lge.com>]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 05:28:30PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>

> +static inline bool swp_tb_is_countable(unsigned long swp_tb)
> +{
> +	return (swp_tb_is_shadow(swp_tb) || swp_tb_is_folio(swp_tb) ||
> +		swp_tb_is_null(swp_tb));
> +}

What do you think about simplifying swp_tb_is_countable by just checking
!swp_tb_is_bad(swp_tb)?

Since this function appears to be called frequently, reducing the number of
comparisons would be beneficial for performance. If validation is
necessary for debugging perhaps we could introduce a separate version for debugging
purposes.

> +static inline int swp_tb_get_count(unsigned long swp_tb)
> +{
> +	if (swp_tb_is_countable(swp_tb))
> +		return __swp_tb_get_count(swp_tb);
> +	return -EINVAL;
>  }

Or, could we simply drop the check in swp_tb_get_count and call
__swp_tb_get_count directly?
If we define SWP_TB_BAD to have 0 in the count bits (MSB), it will
naturally yield a count of 0.

Thanks!
Youngjun Park