Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] mm/zone_device: Reinitialize large zone device private folios

[Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 07:01:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 20:19:52 +0100 Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > 
> > Reinitialize metadata for large zone device private folios in
> > zone_device_page_init prior to creating a higher-order zone device
> > private folio. This step is necessary when the folio’s order changes
> > dynamically between zone_device_page_init calls to avoid building a
> > corrupt folio. As part of the metadata reinitialization, the dev_pagemap
> > must be passed in from the caller because the pgmap stored in the folio
> > page may have been overwritten with a compound head.
> > 
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pagemap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pagemap.c
> > @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static void drm_pagemap_get_devmem_page(struct page *page,
> >  					struct drm_pagemap_zdd *zdd)
> >  {
> >  	page->zone_device_data = drm_pagemap_zdd_get(zdd);
> > -	zone_device_page_init(page, 0);
> > +	zone_device_page_init(page, zdd->dpagemap->pagemap, 0);
> >  }
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pagemap.c:200:40: error: 'struct drm_pagemap_zdd' has no member named 'dpagemap'
> 
> I guess this was accidentally fixed in a later patch?
> 

Ah, no. This is because we merged some in drm-tip which is not 6.19,
this is based on the drm-tip branch.

> Please let's decide whether to fast-track the [1/N] fix into mainline
> and if so, prepare something which compiles!

Maybe we just take this through the MM repo then? I suppose I should
send out patch which applies to the MM repo? I just cloned that repo.

Matt