From: "Lai, Yi" <yi1.lai@linux.intel.com>
To: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Youngjun Park <youngjun.park@lge.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/19] mm, swap: cleanup swap entry management workflow
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 21:28:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWeZ4LmfwiS9iwYF@ly-workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251220-swap-table-p2-v5-14-8862a265a033@tencent.com>
Hi Kairui Song,
Greetings!
I used Syzkaller and found that there is possible deadlock in swap_free_hibernation_slot in linux-next next-20260113.
After bisection and the first bad commit is:
"
33be6f68989d mm. swap: cleanup swap entry management workflow
"
All detailed into can be found at:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/260114_102849_swap_free_hibernation_slot
Syzkaller repro code:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/260114_102849_swap_free_hibernation_slot/repro.c
Syzkaller repro syscall steps:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/260114_102849_swap_free_hibernation_slot/repro.prog
Syzkaller report:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/260114_102849_swap_free_hibernation_slot/repro.report
Kconfig(make olddefconfig):
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/260114_102849_swap_free_hibernation_slot/kconfig_origin
Bisect info:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/260114_102849_swap_free_hibernation_slot/bisect_info.log
bzImage:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/raw/refs/heads/main/260114_102849_swap_free_hibernation_slot/bzImage_0f853ca2a798ead9d24d39cad99b0966815c582a
Issue dmesg:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/blob/main/260114_102849_swap_free_hibernation_slot/0f853ca2a798ead9d24d39cad99b0966815c582a_dmesg.log
"
[ 62.477554] ============================================
[ 62.477802] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 62.478059] 6.19.0-rc5-next-20260113-0f853ca2a798 #1 Not tainted
[ 62.478324] --------------------------------------------
[ 62.478549] repro/668 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 62.478759] ffff888011664018 (&cluster_info[i].lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: swap_free_hibernation_slot+0x13e/0x2a0
[ 62.479271]
[ 62.479271] but task is already holding lock:
[ 62.479519] ffff888011664018 (&cluster_info[i].lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: swap_free_hibernation_slot+0xfa/0x2a0
[ 62.479984]
[ 62.479984] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 62.480293] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 62.480293]
[ 62.480565] CPU0
[ 62.480686] ----
[ 62.480809] lock(&cluster_info[i].lock);
[ 62.481010] lock(&cluster_info[i].lock);
[ 62.481205]
[ 62.481205] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 62.481205]
[ 62.481481] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 62.481481]
[ 62.481802] 2 locks held by repro/668:
[ 62.481981] #0: ffffffff87542e28 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lock_system_sleep+0x92/0xb0
[ 62.482439] #1: ffff888011664018 (&cluster_info[i].lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: swap_free_hibernation_slot+0xfa/0x0
[ 62.482936]
[ 62.482936] stack backtrace:
[ 62.483131] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 668 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.19.0-rc5-next-20260113-0f853ca2a798 #1 PREEMPT(l
[ 62.483143] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.q4
[ 62.483151] Call Trace:
[ 62.483156] <TASK>
[ 62.483160] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150
[ 62.483195] dump_stack+0x19/0x20
[ 62.483206] print_deadlock_bug+0x22e/0x300
[ 62.483215] __lock_acquire+0x1325/0x2210
[ 62.483226] lock_acquire+0x170/0x2f0
[ 62.483234] ? swap_free_hibernation_slot+0x13e/0x2a0
[ 62.483249] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
[ 62.483267] ? swap_free_hibernation_slot+0x13e/0x2a0
[ 62.483279] swap_free_hibernation_slot+0x13e/0x2a0
[ 62.483291] ? __pfx_swap_free_hibernation_slot+0x10/0x10
[ 62.483303] ? locks_remove_file+0xe2/0x7f0
[ 62.483322] ? __pfx_snapshot_release+0x10/0x10
[ 62.483331] free_all_swap_pages+0xdd/0x160
[ 62.483339] ? __pfx_snapshot_release+0x10/0x10
[ 62.483346] snapshot_release+0xac/0x200
[ 62.483353] __fput+0x41f/0xb70
[ 62.483369] ____fput+0x22/0x30
[ 62.483376] task_work_run+0x19e/0x2b0
[ 62.483391] ? __pfx_task_work_run+0x10/0x10
[ 62.483398] ? nsproxy_free+0x2da/0x5b0
[ 62.483410] ? switch_task_namespaces+0x118/0x130
[ 62.483421] do_exit+0x869/0x2810
[ 62.483435] ? do_group_exit+0x1d8/0x2c0
[ 62.483445] ? __pfx_do_exit+0x10/0x10
[ 62.483451] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30
[ 62.483463] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2c/0x60
[ 62.483474] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x85/0x110
[ 62.483486] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2c/0x60
[ 62.483498] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x26/0x130
[ 62.483516] do_group_exit+0xe4/0x2c0
[ 62.483524] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x4d/0x60
[ 62.483531] x64_sys_call+0x21a2/0x21b0
[ 62.483544] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x1180
[ 62.483560] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 62.483584] RIP: 0033:0x7fe84fb18a4d
[ 62.483595] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fe84fb18a23.
[ 62.483602] RSP: 002b:00007fff3e35c928 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7
[ 62.483610] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe84fbf69e0 RCX: 00007fe84fb18a4d
[ 62.483615] RDX: 00000000000000e7 RSI: ffffffffffffff80 RDI: 0000000000000001
[ 62.483620] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000020
[ 62.483624] R10: 00007fff3e35c7d0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fe84fbf69e0
[ 62.483629] R13: 00007fe84fbfbf00 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fe84fbfbee8
[ 62.483640] </TASK>
"
Hope this cound be insightful to you.
Regards,
Yi Lai
---
If you don't need the following environment to reproduce the problem or if you
already have one reproduced environment, please ignore the following information.
How to reproduce:
git clone https://gitlab.com/xupengfe/repro_vm_env.git
cd repro_vm_env
tar -xvf repro_vm_env.tar.gz
cd repro_vm_env; ./start3.sh // it needs qemu-system-x86_64 and I used v7.1.0
// start3.sh will load bzImage_2241ab53cbb5cdb08a6b2d4688feb13971058f65 v6.2-rc5 kernel
// You could change the bzImage_xxx as you want
// Maybe you need to remove line "-drive if=pflash,format=raw,readonly=on,file=./OVMF_CODE.fd \" for different qemu version
You could use below command to log in, there is no password for root.
ssh -p 10023 root@localhost
After login vm(virtual machine) successfully, you could transfer reproduced
binary to the vm by below way, and reproduce the problem in vm:
gcc -pthread -o repro repro.c
scp -P 10023 repro root@localhost:/root/
Get the bzImage for target kernel:
Please use target kconfig and copy it to kernel_src/.config
make olddefconfig
make -jx bzImage //x should equal or less than cpu num your pc has
Fill the bzImage file into above start3.sh to load the target kernel in vm.
Tips:
If you already have qemu-system-x86_64, please ignore below info.
If you want to install qemu v7.1.0 version:
git clone https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git
cd qemu
git checkout -f v7.1.0
mkdir build
cd build
yum install -y ninja-build.x86_64
yum -y install libslirp-devel.x86_64
../configure --target-list=x86_64-softmmu --enable-kvm --enable-vnc --enable-gtk --enable-sdl --enable-usb-redir --enable-slirp
make
make install
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 19:43 [PATCH v5 00/19] mm, swap: swap table phase II: unify swapin use swap cache and cleanup flags Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 01/19] mm, swap: rename __read_swap_cache_async to swap_cache_alloc_folio Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 02/19] mm, swap: split swap cache preparation loop into a standalone helper Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 03/19] mm, swap: never bypass the swap cache even for SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 04/19] mm, swap: always try to free swap cache for SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO devices Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 05/19] mm, swap: simplify the code and reduce indention Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 06/19] mm, swap: free the swap cache after folio is mapped Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 08/19] mm/shmem, swap: remove SWAP_MAP_SHMEM Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 09/19] mm, swap: swap entry of a bad slot should not be considered as swapped out Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 10/19] mm, swap: consolidate cluster reclaim and usability check Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 11/19] mm, swap: split locked entry duplicating into a standalone helper Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 12/19] mm, swap: use swap cache as the swap in synchronize layer Kairui Song
2026-01-12 18:33 ` Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 13/19] mm, swap: remove workaround for unsynchronized swap map cache state Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 14/19] mm, swap: cleanup swap entry management workflow Kairui Song
2025-12-20 4:02 ` Baoquan He
2025-12-22 2:43 ` Kairui Song
2026-01-07 16:05 ` Kairui Song
2026-01-14 12:16 ` Chris Mason
2026-01-14 13:28 ` Lai, Yi [this message]
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 15/19] mm, swap: add folio to swap cache directly on allocation Kairui Song
2025-12-20 4:12 ` Baoquan He
2025-12-22 2:42 ` Kairui Song
2025-12-22 3:41 ` Baoquan He
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 16/19] mm, swap: check swap table directly for checking cache Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 17/19] mm, swap: clean up and improve swap entries freeing Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 18/19] mm, swap: drop the SWAP_HAS_CACHE flag Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 19/19] mm, swap: remove no longer needed _swap_info_get Kairui Song
2025-12-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/19] mm/shmem: never bypass the swap cache for SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO Kairui Song
2025-12-19 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 00/19] mm, swap: swap table phase II: unify swapin use swap cache and cleanup flags Kairui Song
2025-12-20 12:34 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWeZ4LmfwiS9iwYF@ly-workstation \
--to=yi1.lai@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox