From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Xin Zhao <jackzxcui1989@163.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, riel@surriel.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, harry.yoo@oracle.com,
jannh@google.com, willy@infradead.org, axelrasmussen@google.com,
yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: add skipexec mode not to reclaim pages with VM_EXEC vma flag
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:20:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aW__D24ZrpeSPKZN@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260116042817.3790405-1-jackzxcui1989@163.com>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:28:17PM +0800, Xin Zhao wrote:
> For some embedded systems, .text segments are often fixed. In situations
> of high memory pressure, these fixed segments may be reclaimed by the
> system, leading to iowait when these segments will be used again.
> The iowait problem becomes even more severe due to the following reasons:
>
> 1. The reclaimed code segments are often those that handle exceptional
> scenarios, which are not frequently executed. When memory pressure
> increases, the entire system can become sluggish, leading to execution of
> these seldom-used exception-handling code segments. Since these segments
> are more likely to be reclaimed from memory, this exacerbates system
> sluggishness.
>
> 2. The reclaimed code segments used for exception handling are often
> shared by multiple tasks, causing these tasks to wait on the folio's
> PG_locked bit, further increasing I/O wait.
>
> 3. Under memory pressure, the reclamation of code segments is often
> scattered and randomly distributed, slowing down the efficiency of block
> device reads and further exacerbating I/O wait.
>
> While this issue could be addressed by preloading a library mlock all
> executable segments, it would lead to many code segments that are never
> used being locked, resulting in memory waste.
>
> In systems where code execution is relatively fixed, preventing currently
> in-use code segments from being reclaimed makes sense. This acts as a
> self-adaptive way for the system to lock the necessary portions, which
> saves memory compared to locking all code segments with mlock.
Have you tried mlock2(MLOCK_ONFAULT) for your application? It will not
bring in unaccessed segments into memory and only mlocks which is
already in memory or accessed in future?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-16 4:28 Xin Zhao
2026-01-16 8:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-01-16 8:53 ` Xin Zhao
2026-01-20 22:20 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-01-21 3:40 ` Xin Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aW__D24ZrpeSPKZN@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=jackzxcui1989@163.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox