From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
syzbot+178fff6149127421c2cc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/shmem: fix uninitialized folio in shmem_symlink
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 04:29:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVCyRNQ37oGVu4Lj@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4whKLWiw6LNexFPHTFWB1QbSrAwrBtspuc=c8fM2=WnvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 25, 2025 at 05:04:38PM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2025 at 6:01 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 10:40:27PM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> > > From: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Uninitialized folio allocated in shmem_symlink() may be accessed
> > > during swap-out, causing KMSAN BUG:
> >
> > This would be an unfortunate way to fix it. The vast majority of
> > symlinks are short, and we'll never access past the \0 in normal
> > operation, so we'll be dirtying a lot of cachelines essentially to (1)
> > shut up an automated tool and (2) optimise a corner case.
> >
> > How about this instead which delays zeroing to swapout?
>
> Matthew, thank you very much for your review, even during Christmas.
> I would like to wish you a happy holiday!
Heh, thanks. My mailserver is actually in a different timezone from me,
so it was still the 24th when I sent it ;-)
> I am not quite sure, as shm symlinks do not seem very common. Since
> allocating a folio requires a symname longer than 128 bytes (where
> 128 == SHORT_SYMLINK_LEN), such cases appear even rarer.
Fair enough. I hadn't noticed the SHORT_SYMLINK_LEN case when I
wrote this. That does change things somewhat, but still for a 160 byte
symlink, we have 5 cachelines of data and 59 cachelines of zeroes.
> BTW, do we need to migrate the owner_2 flag in folio_migrate_flags()?
> If so, I am not quite sure it is worth changing the hotpath to
> accommodate this.
It already happens, it's just camouflaged. owner_2 is the same bit as
mappedtodisk.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-28 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-24 9:40 Barry Song
2025-12-24 17:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-12-25 4:04 ` Barry Song
2025-12-25 10:08 ` Baolin Wang
2025-12-28 4:29 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aVCyRNQ37oGVu4Lj@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=syzbot+178fff6149127421c2cc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox