From: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
To: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: do not call sched_mm_cid_after_execve() on exec fail
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 20:10:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUvYMRmkWXUuuWXW@ndev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218032327.199721-1-wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:23:23AM +0800, Jinchao Wang wrote:
Hi, mathieu
Please review this patch for mm_cid.
The syzbot test failure occurs because the syz-repro breaks the system
state, causing all user commands to fail. Actually the syz-rero can only
trigger a panic or error.
The broken system can be recovered by resetting binfmt_misc with:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/status
Thanks.
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
> sched_mm_cid_after_execve() is called from the failure path
> of bprm_execve(). At that point exec has not completed successfully,
> so updating the mm CID state is incorrect and can trigger a panic,
> as reported by syzbot.
>
> Remove the call from the exec failure path.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: syzbot+9ca2c6e6b098bf5ae60a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/exec.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 9d5ebc9d15b0..9044a75d26ab 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -1773,7 +1773,6 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> if (bprm->point_of_no_return && !fatal_signal_pending(current))
> force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV);
>
> - sched_mm_cid_after_execve(current);
> rseq_force_update();
> current->in_execve = 0;
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-24 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 3:23 Jinchao Wang
2025-12-24 12:10 ` Jinchao Wang [this message]
2025-12-24 13:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-12-25 0:01 ` Jinchao Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aUvYMRmkWXUuuWXW@ndev \
--to=wangjinchao600@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox