Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests/mm: fix va_high_addr_switch.sh return value

[Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 05:15:31PM -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 12:32:16 +0800 Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Dec 21, 2025 at 10:57:09AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 12:00:21 +0800 Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > > > According to the doc below, I don't add the cover letter, not sure if cover
> > > > letter is preferred, and if that's the case, the doc need an update.
> > > 
> > > Funnily enough, your series was in the exact format which I use when
> > > committing patch series.  Usually people put the cover letter in a
> > > separate [0/N] email and I move that into the [1/N] patch's changelog,
> > > as you've done here.
> > 
> > yes, I see cover-letter is the actualy way people is using and looks
> > like I did some of your work putting that cover letter into the first
> > patch. I think I'll add cover-letter in the future.
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > https://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt
> > > 
> > > God does that still exist?  Pretty soon it will be able to legally
> > > drink in bars.
> > > 
> > > I think its content got absorbed into a Documentation/ file a long time
> > > ago!
> > 
> > I happened to open it before I submitting my patch, and wanted to know 
> > what would happen if I follow that. And it looks like cover letter has
> > become the actual convention.
> 
> I think you could use
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst instead.  The html version is also
> available at
> https://origin.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

Thanks! Sure. I'll use that. I know this doc, it's where I find the tpp.txt
in the 'References' section.

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> SJ
> 
> [...]
>