Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory-failure: teach kill_accessing_process to accept hugetlb tail page pfn

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 10:55:16AM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
>  static int check_hwpoisoned_entry(pte_t pte, unsigned long addr, short shift,
> -				unsigned long poisoned_pfn, struct to_kill *tk)
> +				unsigned long poisoned_pfn, struct to_kill *tk,
> +				int pte_nr)

if we pass in huge_page_mask() instead ...

>  {
>  	unsigned long pfn = 0;
> +	unsigned long hwpoison_vaddr;
>  
>  	if (pte_present(pte)) {
>  		pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
> @@ -694,10 +696,11 @@ static int check_hwpoisoned_entry(pte_t pte, unsigned long addr, short shift,
>  			pfn = swp_offset_pfn(swp);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!pfn || pfn != poisoned_pfn)
> +	if (!pfn || (pfn > poisoned_pfn || (pfn + pte_nr - 1) < poisoned_pfn))

... then we can simplify this to:

	if (!pfn || ((pfn | mask) != (poisoned_pfn | mask))

>  		return 0;
> @@ -2037,6 +2038,7 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
>  		return action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON, MF_IGNORED);
>  	}
>  
> +
>  	folio = page_folio(p);
>  	folio_lock(folio);

unnecessary whitespace change