* [PATCH v3] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep
@ 2025-12-15 10:40 Brendan Jackman
2025-12-15 18:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-12-16 4:16 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Jackman @ 2025-12-15 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Brendan Jackman
The only reason vmap_range_noflush() can sleep is because of pagetable
allocations.
The actual allocation mechanism is arch-specific so might_alloc()
doesn't work here (what GFP flags would be used?). Hence, just add a
comment.
Also note that this might do a TLB shootdown. This is not actually
sleeping but it requires IRQs on for x86, and might_sleep() incidentally
serves to detect violations of that too.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
---
Applies to mm-new.
Changes in v3:
- Added note about TLB shootdowns and x86.
- Since the comment no longer fit on one line anyway, also be a bit more
verbose in general.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251209-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-v2-1-2462ba26ead1@google.com
Changes in v2:
- Switched from might_alloc() to keeping might_sleep() + comment
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251208-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-v1-1-94a9bb8ecb08@google.com
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 41dd01e8430c548167d6123f6ec66bf798f20eec..be4e5f2566a4490d45de29568df538b7c8515b01 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -305,6 +305,11 @@ static int vmap_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
int err;
pgtbl_mod_mask mask = 0;
+ /*
+ * Might allocate pagetables (for most archs a more precise annotation
+ * would be might_alloc(GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL)). Also might shootdown TLB
+ * (requires IRQs enabled on x86).
+ */
might_sleep();
BUG_ON(addr >= end);
---
base-commit: d0a24447990a9d8212bfb3a692d59efa74ce9f86
change-id: 20251208-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-754a791e4e10
Best regards,
--
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep
2025-12-15 10:40 [PATCH v3] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep Brendan Jackman
@ 2025-12-15 18:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-12-16 4:16 ` Anshuman Khandual
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Uladzislau Rezki @ 2025-12-15 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brendan Jackman
Cc: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki, Anshuman Khandual, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 10:40:25AM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> The only reason vmap_range_noflush() can sleep is because of pagetable
> allocations.
>
> The actual allocation mechanism is arch-specific so might_alloc()
> doesn't work here (what GFP flags would be used?). Hence, just add a
> comment.
>
> Also note that this might do a TLB shootdown. This is not actually
> sleeping but it requires IRQs on for x86, and might_sleep() incidentally
> serves to detect violations of that too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
> ---
> Applies to mm-new.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Added note about TLB shootdowns and x86.
> - Since the comment no longer fit on one line anyway, also be a bit more
> verbose in general.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251209-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-v2-1-2462ba26ead1@google.com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Switched from might_alloc() to keeping might_sleep() + comment
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251208-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-v1-1-94a9bb8ecb08@google.com
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 41dd01e8430c548167d6123f6ec66bf798f20eec..be4e5f2566a4490d45de29568df538b7c8515b01 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,11 @@ static int vmap_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> int err;
> pgtbl_mod_mask mask = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Might allocate pagetables (for most archs a more precise annotation
> + * would be might_alloc(GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL)). Also might shootdown TLB
> + * (requires IRQs enabled on x86).
> + */
> might_sleep();
> BUG_ON(addr >= end);
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: d0a24447990a9d8212bfb3a692d59efa74ce9f86
> change-id: 20251208-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-754a791e4e10
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
--
Uladzislau Rezki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep
2025-12-15 10:40 [PATCH v3] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep Brendan Jackman
2025-12-15 18:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
@ 2025-12-16 4:16 ` Anshuman Khandual
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2025-12-16 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brendan Jackman, Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 15/12/25 4:10 PM, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> The only reason vmap_range_noflush() can sleep is because of pagetable
> allocations.
>
> The actual allocation mechanism is arch-specific so might_alloc()
> doesn't work here (what GFP flags would be used?). Hence, just add a
> comment.
>
> Also note that this might do a TLB shootdown. This is not actually
> sleeping but it requires IRQs on for x86, and might_sleep() incidentally
> serves to detect violations of that too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> Applies to mm-new.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Added note about TLB shootdowns and x86.
> - Since the comment no longer fit on one line anyway, also be a bit more
> verbose in general.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251209-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-v2-1-2462ba26ead1@google.com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Switched from might_alloc() to keeping might_sleep() + comment
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251208-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-v1-1-94a9bb8ecb08@google.com
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 41dd01e8430c548167d6123f6ec66bf798f20eec..be4e5f2566a4490d45de29568df538b7c8515b01 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,11 @@ static int vmap_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> int err;
> pgtbl_mod_mask mask = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Might allocate pagetables (for most archs a more precise annotation
> + * would be might_alloc(GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL)). Also might shootdown TLB
> + * (requires IRQs enabled on x86).
> + */
> might_sleep();
> BUG_ON(addr >= end);
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: d0a24447990a9d8212bfb3a692d59efa74ce9f86
> change-id: 20251208-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-754a791e4e10
>
> Best regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-16 4:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-15 10:40 [PATCH v3] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep Brendan Jackman
2025-12-15 18:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-12-16 4:16 ` Anshuman Khandual
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox