From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C13AAD3C932 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 23:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2E0E36B0006; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:30:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 290AF6B0007; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:30:59 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 159816B0008; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:30:59 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BAD6B0006 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:30:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945C78AF8B for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 23:30:58 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84205158996.28.87754C7 Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com (mail-pf1-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC304120011 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 23:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=VDzoWwfe; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of vishal.moola@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vishal.moola@gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1765409456; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YjiGt7D1UtEs6VgMG1W7xx9UZmL11FdXGVD5POBZ+g9dp00PDcLu/R1h3333Yu396ZQEts EKn1+pbh0dnity2sYazCRNUFqDNH0J4AJXFwyiIe3Sc6puRwK0oFSkpkkpFoGCk6lh5wFh 0jyaPLBYCw8WNsSHjugay40FRrlTRYQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=VDzoWwfe; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of vishal.moola@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vishal.moola@gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1765409456; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=vOlEqmVy+73U363CFognUBRa2K0i3PxWElxkDhZWjLk=; b=0QK1pXBOn4y2Q6qm8zXU2CJO5uQcMH/Z+j0wTQxri8dHEf8osEeVk2QyIZyAuWGZT2a7D2 nTj8EjQNpC5MIRBq71UcEE9FMh/URKY1zR2dlIlbefuAa2NZQB9vysc5Zqt4gbjONGEVlN g86HZF0nHvmmsliDM/EYhJtytedpnaQ= Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7bc248dc16aso292962b3a.0 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:30:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1765409455; x=1766014255; darn=kvack.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vOlEqmVy+73U363CFognUBRa2K0i3PxWElxkDhZWjLk=; b=VDzoWwfeBC+/d9qA8jStonzuyd2ADpe88+c28J/nLHGddNMvCV/Mgs4L5JlNyqldrh HPCKz4rxK+ucdeKq0JO84AF4TO1fa+Aw4GKcAl3ufbSh447OYcO2xzhRYtqQOvFPd796 FZGIIqIa1RLcT77R/JaVUVHAQpxf21gU1VtyZ4jMa97acCsGMXzIZkZg9Qm+un3d5buJ 854Plq3LaVh0pjVv9LPuXQaTCj7xShVFLoeyOBA7O0HMbQS4Cke5LPRoQdYCfztOVVWt PkHZMyY46jMwCucGhimIzR+8sukwCDbOLO5/GqBFhy36YAoreo6lPYpN1CN4nhpHbDf3 NyVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1765409455; x=1766014255; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vOlEqmVy+73U363CFognUBRa2K0i3PxWElxkDhZWjLk=; b=hnkaNpa1aalxsFNmpww5x4UE6C0kfSlLmpUp1tD+Khe0AtFhPc8VvpLZY9xxTG0Peq ARWzEe9sU/d/lIl+I7XGiwQRXW+py2KUmnXQKEo+/Xofn7B3XsUmaIMLI/frgtfxrUa9 jvNmVuYoF+Tn2KiMf+OIv/S+Bi/6nCXqoQl0PVIF+CaD3uhGEuKlZzL/fMlxRJvd+Ati Ss7spYgbAU+QcEJ5rMxveKKHOSAqgenHST12FHgPSbdDnTJ6ooy9vJSmTBW9A6eJ1R9+ vaCgY8GRgUMf+/CNREXbprPDoAaVvL0BSoegcVWchbwXtPXFc3//CZ1anhgPBtCQhTGb XPuw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXB6b2T8d4Rp5l+GcAndyrPc9/c1J565gMz0MjgAuhTZiCQbA+wcDOZExp+GV3JhjHIoobnVKjO9A==@kvack.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxNj3LxK3sXerrq4XmzcR/v7EfNyOSJoAPGOF71x3FCeuZYLnbR m2rAHMhCZCYtUoy5lTLUxyZJhdZgqYdmfWx01FRR9MXDQAh2jvsyEVLo X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsMhclmJxNqHz2GJ2umvfU5LwSFSNDCMkraIXaFrzkQ9EgzIsJOVBimz+n8Dpt Axze152EAkmyTX4xcUVBzp4af70Tv5LQ8CAVWrItbdJKL3dWJAF1Mc8UrbS4Gkxs4mkzgYpD8An Rti8AUD63lViYWmyZCAJuVcAfQ/2DyqudJg31ay7ddQbQlz3LVv+BLzrLCaNA07IznjVKskkkO7 AfdbjFIA83hpnd1xQ7oYmeS2YVU2S6oyQQqmpvFQgDi5PBbzH6BmAafC6JuxljorEAEvzLdpt10 sm4UUwOUWf9qWzu5MppC40x7pp6HnLVJch4QtnGID+b5SrTgL3ec6Z0vlTl5cSiQ5W/MPxztH+L evH2JfDyR/jTt8b1vrYcrYcr7ipLKhjdWdB20jbLpVwyW9jiEW3kwgwlsDfGLXrmkGNl6xBEhho kBHd+pNfpiQn4BYyfhClCG6frKxT6ItVjsKNt9nUNkH4s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFCB72B0o/sQmDTGIyPzZQLIGJRF1ZYB+3n5K7iLoBLsX+2QIXcCLgHbcUIqgdJt6uXdprH3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:7022:ec09:b0:11a:335d:80d2 with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-11f296d74d6mr2913960c88.35.1765409455190; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:30:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora (c-67-164-59-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.164.59.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a92af1059eb24-11f2e2ffac2sm2541353c88.11.2025.12.10.15.30.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:30:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:30:51 -0800 From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" To: kernel test robot Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Uladzislau Rezki , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm/vmalloc] a061578043: BUG:spinlock_trylock_failure_on_UP_on_CPU Message-ID: References: <202512101320.e2f2dd6f-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202512101320.e2f2dd6f-lkp@intel.com> X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CC304120011 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Stat-Signature: apykjt76x1i9hj78qs16bysdniqunih8 X-HE-Tag: 1765409456-52594 X-HE-Meta: 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 CSx14Y++ lKdjy8ARD3Kt1Hm95I47pTQecLNFK3gbHmWrC9VuaUNn9sFQubXCN3lZTXbDU0upE9+FiPtKwmY8JU3XCX57WnXa/WD7ABGwhbXXu7HtVSSPuXamJ4AoBwe/Q+swzBzWRc9Fq X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 02:10:28PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > Hello, > > kernel test robot noticed "BUG:spinlock_trylock_failure_on_UP_on_CPU" on: > > commit: a0615780439938e8e61343f1f92a4c54a71dc6a5 ("mm/vmalloc: request large order pages from buddy allocator") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > [test failed on linus/master cb015814f8b6eebcbb8e46e111d108892c5e6821] > [test failed on linux-next/master c75caf76ed86bbc15a72808f48f8df1608a0886c] > > in testcase: trinity > version: > with following parameters: > > runtime: 300s > group: group-03 > nr_groups: 5 > > > > config: x86_64-randconfig-011-20251207 > compiler: clang-20 > test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 32G > > (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace) > > > the issue show randomly (~50%) in tests. > > 645a3c4243473d5c a0615780439938e8e61343f1f92 > ---------------- --------------------------- > fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs > | | | > :60 50% 29:60 dmesg.BUG:spinlock_trylock_failure_on_UP_on_CPU > :60 50% 29:60 dmesg.RIP:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202512101320.e2f2dd6f-lkp@intel.com > > > [ 1046.632156][ C0] BUG: spinlock trylock failure on UP on CPU#0, kcompactd0/28 > [ 1046.633368][ C0] lock: 0xffff888807e35ef0, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kcompactd0/28, .owner_cpu: 0 > [ 1046.634872][ C0] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 28 Comm: kcompactd0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc5-00127-ga06157804399 #1 PREEMPT 8cc09ef94dcec767faa911515ce9e609c45db470 > [ 1046.637019][ C0] Call Trace: > [ 1046.637563][ C0] > [ 1046.638038][ C0] __dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:95) > [ 1046.638781][ C0] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) > [ 1046.639512][ C0] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130) > [ 1046.640168][ C0] spin_dump (kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:71) > [ 1046.640853][ C0] do_raw_spin_trylock (kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:?) > [ 1046.641678][ C0] _raw_spin_trylock (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:89 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:138) > [ 1046.642473][ C0] __free_frozen_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2973) > [ 1046.643279][ C0] ___free_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:5295) > [ 1046.643956][ C0] __free_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:5334) > [ 1046.644624][ C0] tlb_remove_table_rcu (include/linux/mm.h:? include/linux/mm.h:3122 include/asm-generic/tlb.h:220 mm/mmu_gather.c:227 mm/mmu_gather.c:290) > [ 1046.645520][ C0] ? __cfi_tlb_remove_table_rcu (mm/mmu_gather.c:289) > [ 1046.646384][ C0] ? rcu_core (kernel/rcu/tree.c:?) > [ 1046.647092][ C0] rcu_core (include/linux/rcupdate.h:341 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2607 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2861) > [ 1046.647774][ C0] rcu_core_si (kernel/rcu/tree.c:2879) > [ 1046.648439][ C0] handle_softirqs (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 include/trace/events/irq.h:142 kernel/softirq.c:623) > [ 1046.649202][ C0] __irq_exit_rcu (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 kernel/softirq.c:725) > [ 1046.649919][ C0] irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:741) > [ 1046.650593][ C0] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1052) > [ 1046.651520][ C0] > [ 1046.651984][ C0] > [ 1046.652466][ C0] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:697) > [ 1046.653389][ C0] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:95 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:152 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194) > [ 1046.654391][ C0] Code: 00 44 89 f6 c1 ee 09 48 c7 c7 e0 f2 7e 86 31 d2 31 c9 e8 e8 dd 80 fd 4d 85 f6 74 05 e8 de e5 fd ff 0f ba e3 09 73 01 fb 31 f6 0d 2f dc 6f 01 0f 95 c3 40 0f 94 c6 48 c7 c7 10 f3 7e 86 31 d2 > All code > ======== > 0: 00 44 89 f6 add %al,-0xa(%rcx,%rcx,4) > 4: c1 ee 09 shr $0x9,%esi > 7: 48 c7 c7 e0 f2 7e 86 mov $0xffffffff867ef2e0,%rdi > e: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx > 10: 31 c9 xor %ecx,%ecx > 12: e8 e8 dd 80 fd call 0xfffffffffd80ddff > 17: 4d 85 f6 test %r14,%r14 > 1a: 74 05 je 0x21 > 1c: e8 de e5 fd ff call 0xfffffffffffde5ff > 21: 0f ba e3 09 bt $0x9,%ebx > 25: 73 01 jae 0x28 > 27: fb sti > 28: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi > 2a:* ff 0d 2f dc 6f 01 decl 0x16fdc2f(%rip) # 0x16fdc5f <-- trapping instruction > 30: 0f 95 c3 setne %bl > 33: 40 0f 94 c6 sete %sil > 37: 48 c7 c7 10 f3 7e 86 mov $0xffffffff867ef310,%rdi > 3e: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx > > Code starting with the faulting instruction > =========================================== > 0: ff 0d 2f dc 6f 01 decl 0x16fdc2f(%rip) # 0x16fdc35 > 6: 0f 95 c3 setne %bl > 9: 40 0f 94 c6 sete %sil > d: 48 c7 c7 10 f3 7e 86 mov $0xffffffff867ef310,%rdi > 14: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx > [ 1046.657511][ C0] RSP: 0000:ffffc900001cfb50 EFLAGS: 00000246 > [ 1046.658482][ C0] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000206 RCX: 0000000000000000 > [ 1046.659740][ C0] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 > [ 1046.660979][ C0] RBP: ffffc900001cfb68 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > [ 1046.662239][ C0] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888807e35f50 > [ 1046.663505][ C0] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 > [ 1046.664741][ C0] free_pcppages_bulk (mm/page_alloc.c:1494) > [ 1046.665618][ C0] drain_pages_zone (include/linux/spinlock.h:391 mm/page_alloc.c:2632) > [ 1046.666374][ C0] __drain_all_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2731) > [ 1046.667171][ C0] drain_all_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2747) > [ 1046.667908][ C0] kcompactd (mm/compaction.c:3115) > [ 1046.668625][ C0] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:465) > [ 1046.669299][ C0] ? __cfi_kcompactd (mm/compaction.c:3166) > [ 1046.670046][ C0] ? __cfi_kthread (kernel/kthread.c:412) > [ 1046.670764][ C0] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:164) > [ 1046.671483][ C0] ? __cfi_kthread (kernel/kthread.c:412) > [ 1046.672174][ C0] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:255) > [ 1046.672936][ C0] > > > > The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251210/202512101320.e2f2dd6f-lkp@intel.com > Hmmm. This looks like a race condition tied to reclaim. I'm assuming we fail to allocate a page and kick off kswapd. Then when we fall back to the bulk allocator which tries to remove a pcp page at the same time as kswapd tries to reclaim it. Maybe? Does something like this fix it? diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index ecbac900c35f..0d1480723ddc 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -3634,7 +3634,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid, struct page *page; int i; unsigned int large_order = ilog2(nr_remaining); - gfp_t large_gfp = vmalloc_gfp_adjust(gfp, large_order) & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM; + gfp_t large_gfp = vmalloc_gfp_adjust(gfp, large_order) & ~__GFP_RECLAIM; large_order = min(max_attempt_order, large_order);