* [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask'
@ 2025-12-03 1:05 kernel test robot
2025-12-03 14:58 ` Feng Tang
2025-12-03 22:44 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-12-03 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Tang
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List,
Petr Mladek
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head: 47b7b5e32bb7264b51b89186043e1ada4090b558
commit: a9af76a78760717361cccc884dc649e30db61c8b [9966/13055] watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup
config: powerpc64-randconfig-002-20251203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 734a912d0f025559fcf76bde9aaaeb0383c1625a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable]
74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
vim +/hardlockup_si_mask +74 kernel/watchdog.c
62
63 /*
64 * Should we panic when a soft-lockup or hard-lockup occurs:
65 */
66 unsigned int __read_mostly hardlockup_panic =
67 IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC);
68
69 /*
70 * bitmasks to control what kinds of system info to be printed when
71 * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc.
72 * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition.
73 */
> 74 static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask;
75
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' 2025-12-03 1:05 [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' kernel test robot @ 2025-12-03 14:58 ` Feng Tang 2025-12-03 22:44 ` Andrew Morton 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Feng Tang @ 2025-12-03 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernel test robot Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List, Petr Mladek Hi, Thanks for the reporting! On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 09:05:30AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > head: 47b7b5e32bb7264b51b89186043e1ada4090b558 > commit: a9af76a78760717361cccc884dc649e30db61c8b [9966/13055] watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup > config: powerpc64-randconfig-002-20251203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 734a912d0f025559fcf76bde9aaaeb0383c1625a) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/ > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable] > 74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 1 warning generated. I can't reproduce it right now as I'm on travel and only have ARM server to use. (The reproducer need a powerpc64 machine, or have a x86 machine to use your reproducer script). Could you help to test the below patch? thank! - Feng --- diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c index 1f59b950c475..5e5ac82a01f3 100644 --- a/kernel/watchdog.c +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c @@ -66,13 +66,6 @@ int __read_mostly sysctl_hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace; unsigned int __read_mostly hardlockup_panic = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC); -/* - * bitmasks to control what kinds of system info to be printed when - * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. - * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. - */ -static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; - #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS static unsigned int hardlockup_count; @@ -141,6 +134,13 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, watchdog_hardlockup_warned); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, watchdog_hardlockup_touched); static unsigned long hard_lockup_nmi_warn; +/* + * bitmasks to control what kinds of system info to be printed when + * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. + * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. + */ +static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; + notrace void arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(void) { /* @@ -1250,6 +1250,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_sysctls[] = { .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE, }, +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_COUNTS_HRTIMER { .procname = "hardlockup_sys_info", .data = &hardlockup_si_mask, @@ -1257,6 +1258,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_sysctls[] = { .mode = 0644, .proc_handler = sysctl_sys_info_handler, }, +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_SMP { .procname = "hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace", ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' 2025-12-03 1:05 [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' kernel test robot 2025-12-03 14:58 ` Feng Tang @ 2025-12-03 22:44 ` Andrew Morton 2025-12-04 13:38 ` Petr Mladek 2025-12-04 13:57 ` Feng Tang 1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-12-03 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernel test robot Cc: Feng Tang, llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List, Petr Mladek On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:05:30 +0800 kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > head: 47b7b5e32bb7264b51b89186043e1ada4090b558 > commit: a9af76a78760717361cccc884dc649e30db61c8b [9966/13055] watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup > config: powerpc64-randconfig-002-20251203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 734a912d0f025559fcf76bde9aaaeb0383c1625a) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/ > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable] > 74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 1 warning generated. I'm testing the appended patch but it needs checking please. The comment for hardlockup_si_mask says * bitmask to control what kinds of system info to be printed when * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. but the variable depends on "COUNTS_HRTIMER". The comment doesn't mention hrtimers and I don't see why it should. Not sure what's going on here. From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Subject: kernel/watchdog.c: fix unused var warning Date: Wed Dec 3 02:34:40 PM PST 2025 >> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable] 74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated. Fixes: a9af76a78760 ("watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> --- kernel/watchdog.c | 16 +++++++++------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/watchdog.c~kernel-watchdogc-fix-unused-var-warning +++ a/kernel/watchdog.c @@ -66,13 +66,6 @@ int __read_mostly sysctl_hardlockup_all_ unsigned int __read_mostly hardlockup_panic = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC); -/* - * bitmasks to control what kinds of system info to be printed when - * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. - * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. - */ -static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; - #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS static unsigned int hardlockup_count; @@ -135,6 +128,13 @@ __setup("nmi_watchdog=", hardlockup_pani #if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_COUNTS_HRTIMER) +/* + * bitmask to control what kinds of system info to be printed when + * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. + * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. + */ +static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; + static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, hrtimer_interrupts); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hrtimer_interrupts_saved); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, watchdog_hardlockup_warned); @@ -1250,6 +1250,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_s .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE, }, +#if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_COUNTS_HRTIMER) { .procname = "hardlockup_sys_info", .data = &hardlockup_si_mask, @@ -1257,6 +1258,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_s .mode = 0644, .proc_handler = sysctl_sys_info_handler, }, +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_SMP { .procname = "hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace", _ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' 2025-12-03 22:44 ` Andrew Morton @ 2025-12-04 13:38 ` Petr Mladek 2025-12-04 14:12 ` Feng Tang 2025-12-04 13:57 ` Feng Tang 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Petr Mladek @ 2025-12-04 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: kernel test robot, Feng Tang, llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List On Wed 2025-12-03 14:44:53, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:05:30 +0800 kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > head: 47b7b5e32bb7264b51b89186043e1ada4090b558 > > commit: a9af76a78760717361cccc884dc649e30db61c8b [9966/13055] watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup > > config: powerpc64-randconfig-002-20251203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/config) > > compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 734a912d0f025559fcf76bde9aaaeb0383c1625a) > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/ > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > >> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable] > > 74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > 1 warning generated. > > I'm testing the appended patch but it needs checking please. > > The comment for hardlockup_si_mask says > > * bitmask to control what kinds of system info to be printed when > * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. > * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. > > but the variable depends on "COUNTS_HRTIMER". The comment doesn't > mention hrtimers and I don't see why it should. Not sure what's going > on here. Good point! It took me some time to understand it. So, powerpc implements its own watchog, see arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c. The watchdog is supported only by some powerpc platforms, see the following line in arch/powerpc/Kconfig: select HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH if PPC_BOOK3S_64 && SMP As a result, the test system could have the following in the config, see https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/config CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y # CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF is not set # CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_BUDDY is not set CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH=y And "COUNTS_HRTIMER" is not defined. > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Subject: kernel/watchdog.c: fix unused var warning > Date: Wed Dec 3 02:34:40 PM PST 2025 > > >> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable] > 74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 1 warning generated. > > Fixes: a9af76a78760 ("watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup") > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/ > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com > Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com> > Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > --- > > kernel/watchdog.c | 16 +++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > --- a/kernel/watchdog.c~kernel-watchdogc-fix-unused-var-warning > +++ a/kernel/watchdog.c > @@ -66,13 +66,6 @@ int __read_mostly sysctl_hardlockup_all_ > unsigned int __read_mostly hardlockup_panic = > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC); > > -/* > - * bitmasks to control what kinds of system info to be printed when > - * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. > - * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. > - */ > -static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; > - > #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS > > static unsigned int hardlockup_count; > @@ -135,6 +128,13 @@ __setup("nmi_watchdog=", hardlockup_pani > > #if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_COUNTS_HRTIMER) > > +/* > + * bitmask to control what kinds of system info to be printed when > + * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. > + * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. > + */ > +static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; > + > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, hrtimer_interrupts); > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hrtimer_interrupts_saved); > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, watchdog_hardlockup_warned); > @@ -1250,6 +1250,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_s > .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, > .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE, > }, > +#if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_COUNTS_HRTIMER) > { > .procname = "hardlockup_sys_info", > .data = &hardlockup_si_mask, > @@ -1257,6 +1258,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_s > .mode = 0644, > .proc_handler = sysctl_sys_info_handler, > }, > +#endif > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > { > .procname = "hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace", > _ This patch makes some sense because the arch-specific watchdog does not support the sys_info interface. And it is better than nothing. definitely. A better solution would be export the variable and handle it in arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c. It seems that powerpc is the only architecture which could define HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH. Feng, would you have time to look at it? Best Regards, Petr ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' 2025-12-04 13:38 ` Petr Mladek @ 2025-12-04 14:12 ` Feng Tang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Feng Tang @ 2025-12-04 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton, kernel test robot, llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 02:38:42PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Wed 2025-12-03 14:44:53, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:05:30 +0800 kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > > head: 47b7b5e32bb7264b51b89186043e1ada4090b558 > > > commit: a9af76a78760717361cccc884dc649e30db61c8b [9966/13055] watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup > > > config: powerpc64-randconfig-002-20251203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/config) > > > compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 734a912d0f025559fcf76bde9aaaeb0383c1625a) > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/ > > > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > >> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable] > > > 74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > 1 warning generated. > > > > I'm testing the appended patch but it needs checking please. > > > > The comment for hardlockup_si_mask says > > > > * bitmask to control what kinds of system info to be printed when > > * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. > > * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. > > > > but the variable depends on "COUNTS_HRTIMER". The comment doesn't > > mention hrtimers and I don't see why it should. Not sure what's going > > on here. > > Good point! It took me some time to understand it. > > So, powerpc implements its own watchog, see arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c. > The watchdog is supported only by some powerpc platforms, see the > following line in arch/powerpc/Kconfig: > > select HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH if PPC_BOOK3S_64 && SMP > > As a result, the test system could have the following in the config, > see https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/config > > CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y > # CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF is not set > # CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_BUDDY is not set > CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH=y > > And "COUNTS_HRTIMER" is not defined. Thanks for the check! Was working on a reply at the same time :) > > @@ -1250,6 +1250,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_s > > .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, > > .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE, > > }, > > +#if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_COUNTS_HRTIMER) > > { > > .procname = "hardlockup_sys_info", > > .data = &hardlockup_si_mask, > > @@ -1257,6 +1258,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_s > > .mode = 0644, > > .proc_handler = sysctl_sys_info_handler, > > }, > > +#endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > > { > > .procname = "hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace", > > _ > > This patch makes some sense because the arch-specific watchdog does > not support the sys_info interface. And it is better than nothing. > definitely. > > A better solution would be export the variable and handle it > in arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c. Yep! > It seems that powerpc is the only architecture which could define > HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH. > > Feng, would you have time to look at it? Sure. Thanks, Feng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' 2025-12-03 22:44 ` Andrew Morton 2025-12-04 13:38 ` Petr Mladek @ 2025-12-04 13:57 ` Feng Tang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Feng Tang @ 2025-12-04 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: kernel test robot, llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List, Petr Mladek On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 02:44:53PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:05:30 +0800 kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > head: 47b7b5e32bb7264b51b89186043e1ada4090b558 > > commit: a9af76a78760717361cccc884dc649e30db61c8b [9966/13055] watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup > > config: powerpc64-randconfig-002-20251203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/config) > > compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 734a912d0f025559fcf76bde9aaaeb0383c1625a) > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/ > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > >> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable] > > 74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask; > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > 1 warning generated. > > I'm testing the appended patch but it needs checking please. > > The comment for hardlockup_si_mask says > > * bitmask to control what kinds of system info to be printed when > * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc. > * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition. > > but the variable depends on "COUNTS_HRTIMER". The comment doesn't > mention hrtimers and I don't see why it should. Not sure what's going > on here. Yes, it is a little weird. Logically the 'hardlockup_si_mask' should be under the CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR, which is what my original patch did. I did a quick check, and there are 3 types of hardlockup detector: HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_BUDDY HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH IIUC, most archs will use the first 2 types, which will both select HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_COUNTS_HRTIMER (lib/Kconfig.debug), which is kind of a _proxy_ to select SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR which needs hrtimer for its implementations. And only very few arch may chose the 3rd architecture specific implementation, which was in 0day bot's kernel config. In arch/powerpc/Kconfig select HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH if PPC_BOOK3S_64 && SMP select HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF if PERF_EVENTS && HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI In short, for most cases the hrtimer is used for soft/hard lockup detector. Thanks, Feng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-04 14:12 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-12-03 1:05 [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' kernel test robot 2025-12-03 14:58 ` Feng Tang 2025-12-03 22:44 ` Andrew Morton 2025-12-04 13:38 ` Petr Mladek 2025-12-04 14:12 ` Feng Tang 2025-12-04 13:57 ` Feng Tang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox