From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kas@kernel.org, changyuanl@google.com, graf@amazon.com,
leitao@debian.org, thevlad@meta.com, pratyush@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/memblock: only mark/clear KHO scratch memory when needed
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:26:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSlcpJzHw_khKD-Z@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251127203724.3177621-3-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 08:33:20PM +0000, Usama Arif wrote:
> The scratch memory for kexec handover is used to bootstrap the
> kexec'ed kernel. It is only needed when CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER
> is enabled and only if it is a KHO boot. Add checks to prevent
> marking a KHO scratch region unless needed.
Please add a paragraph along the lines of Pratyush's note from
https://lore.kernel.org/all/86bjknyxgu.fsf@kernel.org/:
Yeah, I don't think it will have much of a difference in practice, but I
do think it is a good correctness fix. Marking the lower 1M as scratch
is a hack to get around the limitations with KHO, and we should not be
doing that when KHO isn't involved.
> Fixes: a2daf83e10378 ("x86/e820: temporarily enable KHO scratch for memory below 1M")
> Reported-by: Vlad Poenaru <thevlad@meta.com>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 8b13d5c28922a..8a2cebcfe0a18 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1114,36 +1114,6 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t
> MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * memblock_mark_kho_scratch - Mark a memory region as MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH.
> - * @base: the base phys addr of the region
> - * @size: the size of the region
> - *
> - * Only memory regions marked with %MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH will be considered
> - * for allocations during early boot with kexec handover.
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> - */
> -__init int memblock_mark_kho_scratch(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> -{
> - return memblock_setclr_flag(&memblock.memory, base, size, 1,
> - MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * memblock_clear_kho_scratch - Clear MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH flag for a
> - * specified region.
> - * @base: the base phys addr of the region
> - * @size: the size of the region
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> - */
> -__init int memblock_clear_kho_scratch(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> -{
> - return memblock_setclr_flag(&memblock.memory, base, size, 0,
> - MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH);
> -}
No need to move these functions under #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER. We
already have inline stubs when CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER=n in
include/linux/memblock.h
Just add 'if (is_kho_boot())' here and in memblock_mark_kho_scratch().
> static bool should_skip_region(struct memblock_type *type,
> struct memblock_region *m,
> int nid, int flags)
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-28 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-27 20:33 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: " Usama Arif
2025-11-27 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: remove CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH option Usama Arif
2025-11-27 21:23 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-28 11:57 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-27 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/memblock: only mark/clear KHO scratch memory when needed Usama Arif
2025-11-27 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-27 21:04 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-27 21:30 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-27 21:37 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-28 8:26 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSlcpJzHw_khKD-Z@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=thevlad@meta.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox