From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ilias Stamatis <ilstam@amazon.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
david@kernel.org, nadav.amit@gmail.com,
huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com, bhe@redhat.com,
nh-open-source@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reinstate "resource: avoid unnecessary lookups in find_next_iomem_res()"
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:05:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSSQXPz0f1A_Vb6Z@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251124085816.07dbf5a4ec6235b2943840a0@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 08:58:16AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:53:49 +0000 Ilias Stamatis <ilstam@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> > Commit 97523a4edb7b ("kernel/resource: remove first_lvl / siblings_only
> > logic") removed an optimization introduced by commit 756398750e11
> > ("resource: avoid unnecessary lookups in find_next_iomem_res()"). That
> > was not called out in the message of the first commit explicitly so it's
> > not entirely clear whether removing the optimization happened
> > inadvertently or not.
> >
> > As the original commit message of the optimization explains there is no
> > point considering the children of a subtree in find_next_iomem_res() if
> > the top level range does not match. Reinstating the optimization results
> > in significant performance improvements in systems with very large iomem
> > maps when mmaping /dev/mem.
>
> It would be great if we could quantify "significant performance
> improvements"?
+1. It also would be good to know which exact function(s) is a bottleneck.
The mentioned change updated a handful of them.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-24 16:53 Ilias Stamatis
2025-11-24 16:58 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-24 17:05 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
[not found] ` <c7411175b332f3befb5bebb6a75c7b91f2c1dbbc.camel@amazon.co.uk>
2025-11-24 18:55 ` andriy.shevchenko
2025-11-24 19:35 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2025-11-24 19:52 ` andriy.shevchenko
2025-11-24 23:30 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2025-11-25 6:50 ` andriy.shevchenko
2025-11-25 9:56 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2025-11-25 10:23 ` andriy.shevchenko
2025-11-25 14:23 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2025-11-25 18:30 ` andriy.shevchenko
2025-11-25 8:09 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-25 8:18 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSSQXPz0f1A_Vb6Z@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=ilstam@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox