From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>,
nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
david@redhat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
william.roche@oracle.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, jane.chu@oracle.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, osalvador@suse.de,
muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/huge_memory: introduce uniform_split_unmapped_folio_to_zero_order
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:15:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRqTLmJBuvBcLYMx@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRm6shtKizyrq_TA@casper.infradead.org>
On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 11:51:14AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 01:47:20AM +0000, Jiaqi Yan wrote:
> > Introduce uniform_split_unmapped_folio_to_zero_order, a wrapper
> > to the existing __split_unmapped_folio. Caller can use it to
> > uniformly split an unmapped high-order folio into 0-order folios.
>
> Please don't make this function exist. I appreciate what you're trying
> to do, but let's try to do it differently?
>
> When we have struct folio separately allocated from struct page,
> splitting a folio will mean allocating new struct folios for every
> new folio created. I anticipate an order-0 folio will be about 80 or
> 96 bytes. So if we create 512 * 512 folios in a single go, that'll be
> an allocation of 20MB.
>
> This is why I asked Zi Yan to create the asymmetrical folio split, so we
> only end up creating log() of this. In the case of a single hwpoison page
> in an order-18 hugetlb, that'd be 19 allocations totallying 1520 bytes.
Oh god, I completely overlooked this aspect when discussing this with Jiaqi.
Thanks for raising this concern.
> But since we're only doing this on free, we won't need to do folio
> allocations at all; we'll just be able to release the good pages to the
> page allocator and sequester the hwpoison pages.
[+Cc PAGE ALLOCATOR folks]
So we need an interface to free only healthy portion of a hwpoison folio.
I think a proper approach to this should be to "free a hwpoison folio
just like freeing a normal folio via folio_put() or free_frozen_pages(),
then the page allocator will add only healthy pages to the freelist and
isolate the hwpoison pages". Oherwise we'll end up open coding a lot,
which is too fragile.
In fact, that can be done by teaching free_pages_prepare() how to handle
the case where one or more subpages of a folio are hwpoison pages.
How this should be implemented in the page allocator in memdescs world?
Hmm, we'll want to do some kind of non-uniform split, without actually
splitting the folio but allocating struct buddy?
But... for now I think hiding this complexity inside the page allocator
is good enough. For now this would just mean splitting a frozen page
inside the page allocator (probably non-uniform?). We can later re-implement
this to provide better support for memdescs.
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-16 1:47 [PATCH v1 0/2] Only free healthy pages in high-order HWPoison folio Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-16 1:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/huge_memory: introduce uniform_split_unmapped_folio_to_zero_order Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-16 11:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-17 3:15 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2025-11-17 3:21 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-17 3:39 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-17 13:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-18 6:24 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-18 10:19 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-18 19:26 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-18 21:54 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-19 12:37 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-19 19:21 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-19 20:35 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-16 22:38 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-17 17:12 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-16 1:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/memory-failure: avoid free HWPoison high-order folio Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-16 2:10 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-18 5:12 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-17 17:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-18 5:17 ` Jiaqi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRqTLmJBuvBcLYMx@hyeyoo \
--to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=william.roche@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox