From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: pratyush@kernel.org, jasonmiu@google.com, graf@amazon.com,
dmatlack@google.com, rientjes@google.com, corbet@lwn.net,
rdunlap@infradead.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
kanie@linux.alibaba.com, ojeda@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com,
masahiroy@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org,
yoann.congal@smile.fr, mmaurer@google.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, chenridong@huawei.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
mark.rutland@arm.com, jannh@google.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com,
joel.granados@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
anna.schumaker@oracle.com, song@kernel.org,
zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn, linux@weissschuh.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org,
bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org, cw00.choi@samsung.com,
myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, yesanishhere@gmail.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, leon@kernel.org,
lukas@wunner.de, bhelgaas@google.com, wagi@kernel.org,
djeffery@redhat.com, stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com, ptyadav@amazon.de,
lennart@poettering.net, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
saeedm@nvidia.com, ajayachandra@nvidia.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
parav@nvidia.com, leonro@nvidia.com, witu@nvidia.com,
hughd@google.com, skhawaja@google.com, chrisl@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/22] liveupdate: luo_core: integrate with KHO
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:29:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRcSpbwBabFjeYe3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107210526.257742-3-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 04:03:00PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> Integrate the LUO with the KHO framework to enable passing LUO state
> across a kexec reboot.
>
> When LUO is transitioned to a "prepared" state, it tells KHO to
> finalize, so all memory segments that were added to KHO preservation
> list are getting preserved. After "Prepared" state no new segments
> can be preserved. If LUO is canceled, it also tells KHO to cancel the
> serialization, and therefore, later LUO can go back into the prepared
> state.
>
> This patch introduces the following changes:
> - During the KHO finalization phase allocate FDT blob.
> - Populate this FDT with a LUO compatibility string ("luo-v1").
>
> LUO now depends on `CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER`. The core state transition
> logic (`luo_do_*_calls`) remains unimplemented in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> ---
> include/linux/liveupdate.h | 6 +
> include/linux/liveupdate/abi/luo.h | 54 +++++++
> kernel/liveupdate/luo_core.c | 243 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h | 17 ++
> mm/mm_init.c | 4 +
> 5 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/liveupdate/abi/luo.h
> create mode 100644 kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/liveupdate.h b/include/linux/liveupdate.h
> index 730b76625fec..0be8804fc42a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/liveupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/liveupdate.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE
>
> +void __init liveupdate_init(void);
> +
> /* Return true if live update orchestrator is enabled */
> bool liveupdate_enabled(void);
>
> @@ -21,6 +23,10 @@ int liveupdate_reboot(void);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE */
>
> +static inline void liveupdate_init(void)
> +{
> +}
The common practice is to place brackets at the same line with function
declaration.
...
> +static int __init luo_early_startup(void)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t fdt_phys;
> + int err, ln_size;
> + const void *ptr;
> +
> + if (!kho_is_enabled()) {
> + if (liveupdate_enabled())
> + pr_warn("Disabling liveupdate because KHO is disabled\n");
> + luo_global.enabled = false;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Retrieve LUO subtree, and verify its format. */
> + err = kho_retrieve_subtree(LUO_FDT_KHO_ENTRY_NAME, &fdt_phys);
> + if (err) {
> + if (err != -ENOENT) {
> + pr_err("failed to retrieve FDT '%s' from KHO: %pe\n",
> + LUO_FDT_KHO_ENTRY_NAME, ERR_PTR(err));
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + luo_global.fdt_in = __va(fdt_phys);
phys_to_virt is clearer, isn't it?
> + err = fdt_node_check_compatible(luo_global.fdt_in, 0,
> + LUO_FDT_COMPATIBLE);
...
> +void __init liveupdate_init(void)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = luo_early_startup();
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("The incoming tree failed to initialize properly [%pe], disabling live update\n",
> + ERR_PTR(err));
> + luo_global.enabled = false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* Called during boot to create LUO fdt tree */
^ create outgoing
> +static int __init luo_late_startup(void)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!liveupdate_enabled())
> + return 0;
> +
> + err = luo_fdt_setup();
> + if (err)
> + luo_global.enabled = false;
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +late_initcall(luo_late_startup);
It would be nice to have a comment explaining why late_initcall() is fine
and why there's no need to initialize the outgoing fdt earlier.
> +/**
> + * luo_alloc_preserve - Allocate, zero, and preserve memory.
I think this and the "free" counterparts would be useful for any KHO users,
even those that don't need LUO.
> + * @size: The number of bytes to allocate.
> + *
> + * Allocates a physically contiguous block of zeroed pages that is large
> + * enough to hold @size bytes. The allocated memory is then registered with
> + * KHO for preservation across a kexec.
> + *
> + * Note: The actual allocated size will be rounded up to the nearest
> + * power-of-two page boundary.
> + *
> + * @return A virtual pointer to the allocated and preserved memory on success,
> + * or an ERR_PTR() encoded error on failure.
> + */
> +void *luo_alloc_preserve(size_t size)
> +{
> + struct folio *folio;
> + int order, ret;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + order = get_order(size);
> + if (order > MAX_PAGE_ORDER)
> + return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
High order allocations would likely fail or at least cause a heavy reclaim.
For now it seems that we won't be needing really large contiguous chunks so
maybe limiting this to PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER?
Later if we'd need higher order allocations we can try to allocate with
__GFP_NORETRY or __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with a fallback to vmalloc.
> +
> + folio = folio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
> + if (!folio)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + ret = kho_preserve_folio(folio);
> + if (ret) {
> + folio_put(folio);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> +
> + return folio_address(folio);
> +}
> +
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 21:02 [PATCH v5 00/22] Live Update Orchestrator Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:02 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] liveupdate: luo_core: luo_ioctl: " Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 13:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-13 13:56 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] liveupdate: luo_core: integrate with KHO Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-10 13:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-10 15:43 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-11 20:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-11 20:57 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 13:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 14:58 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 16:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-13 18:38 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-11 20:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-11 20:39 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-11 20:42 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 10:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 12:46 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 13:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 15:14 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 17:39 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 11:29 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-11-14 14:48 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] reboot: call liveupdate_reboot() before kexec Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 11:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] liveupdate: Kconfig: Make debugfs optional Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] liveupdate: kho: when live update add KHO image during kexec load Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-10 12:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-10 15:31 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-11 20:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-11 20:59 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] liveupdate: luo_session: add sessions support Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 20:39 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 20:47 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 12:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-14 14:07 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] liveupdate: luo_ioctl: add user interface Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 12:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-14 14:09 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] liveupdate: luo_file: implement file systems callbacks Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-10 17:27 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-10 17:42 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] liveupdate: luo_session: Add ioctls for file preservation and state management Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] liveupdate: luo_flb: Introduce File-Lifecycle-Bound global state Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] docs: add luo documentation Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] MAINTAINERS: add liveupdate entry Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] mm: shmem: use SHMEM_F_* flags instead of VM_* flags Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] mm: shmem: allow freezing inode mapping Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] mm: shmem: export some functions to internal.h Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] liveupdate: luo_file: add private argument to store runtime state Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] mm: memfd_luo: allow preserving memfd Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] docs: add documentation for memfd preservation via LUO Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 16:55 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 16:59 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] selftests/liveupdate: Add userspace API selftests Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] selftests/liveupdate: Add kexec-based selftest for session lifecycle Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] selftests/liveupdate: Add kexec test for multiple and empty sessions Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] tests/liveupdate: Add in-kernel liveupdate test Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 20:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 20:40 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-16 18:36 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-17 14:09 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 22:33 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] Live Update Orchestrator Andrew Morton
2025-11-08 18:13 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-08 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-09 2:31 ` Pasha Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRcSpbwBabFjeYe3@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jasonmiu@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mmaurer@google.com \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=ptyadav@amazon.de \
--cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wagi@kernel.org \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yesanishhere@gmail.com \
--cc=yoann.congal@smile.fr \
--cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox