* [PATCH] test_kho: always print restore status
@ 2025-11-18 18:10 Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-18 20:31 ` Pasha Tatashin
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pratyush Yadav @ 2025-11-18 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Alexander Graf, Mike Rapoport, Pasha Tatashin,
Pratyush Yadav
Cc: kexec, linux-mm, linux-kernel
Currently the KHO test only prints a message on success, and remains
silent on failure. This makes it difficult to notice a failing test. A
failing test is usually more interesting than a successful one.
Always print the test status after attempting restore.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
---
lib/test_kho.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_kho.c b/lib/test_kho.c
index 85b60d87a50ad..47de562807955 100644
--- a/lib/test_kho.c
+++ b/lib/test_kho.c
@@ -306,7 +306,6 @@ static int kho_test_restore(phys_addr_t fdt_phys)
if (err)
return err;
- pr_info("KHO restore succeeded\n");
return 0;
}
@@ -319,8 +318,15 @@ static int __init kho_test_init(void)
return 0;
err = kho_retrieve_subtree(KHO_TEST_FDT, &fdt_phys);
- if (!err)
- return kho_test_restore(fdt_phys);
+ if (!err) {
+ err = kho_test_restore(fdt_phys);
+ if (err)
+ pr_err("KHO restore failed\n");
+ else
+ pr_info("KHO restore succeeded\n");
+
+ return err;
+ }
if (err != -ENOENT) {
pr_warn("failed to retrieve %s FDT: %d\n", KHO_TEST_FDT, err);
base-commit: f0bfdc2b69f5c600b88ee484c01b213712c63d94
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] test_kho: always print restore status
2025-11-18 18:10 [PATCH] test_kho: always print restore status Pratyush Yadav
@ 2025-11-18 20:31 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-19 7:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-20 1:18 ` SeongJae Park
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pasha Tatashin @ 2025-11-18 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratyush Yadav
Cc: Andrew Morton, Alexander Graf, Mike Rapoport, kexec, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 1:10 PM Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Currently the KHO test only prints a message on success, and remains
> silent on failure. This makes it difficult to notice a failing test. A
> failing test is usually more interesting than a successful one.
>
> Always print the test status after attempting restore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] test_kho: always print restore status
2025-11-18 18:10 [PATCH] test_kho: always print restore status Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-18 20:31 ` Pasha Tatashin
@ 2025-11-19 7:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-20 1:18 ` SeongJae Park
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Rapoport @ 2025-11-19 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratyush Yadav
Cc: Andrew Morton, Alexander Graf, Pasha Tatashin, kexec, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 07:10:45PM +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Currently the KHO test only prints a message on success, and remains
> silent on failure. This makes it difficult to notice a failing test. A
> failing test is usually more interesting than a successful one.
>
> Always print the test status after attempting restore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> lib/test_kho.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_kho.c b/lib/test_kho.c
> index 85b60d87a50ad..47de562807955 100644
> --- a/lib/test_kho.c
> +++ b/lib/test_kho.c
> @@ -306,7 +306,6 @@ static int kho_test_restore(phys_addr_t fdt_phys)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - pr_info("KHO restore succeeded\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -319,8 +318,15 @@ static int __init kho_test_init(void)
> return 0;
>
> err = kho_retrieve_subtree(KHO_TEST_FDT, &fdt_phys);
> - if (!err)
> - return kho_test_restore(fdt_phys);
> + if (!err) {
> + err = kho_test_restore(fdt_phys);
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("KHO restore failed\n");
> + else
> + pr_info("KHO restore succeeded\n");
> +
> + return err;
> + }
>
> if (err != -ENOENT) {
> pr_warn("failed to retrieve %s FDT: %d\n", KHO_TEST_FDT, err);
>
> base-commit: f0bfdc2b69f5c600b88ee484c01b213712c63d94
> --
> 2.47.3
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] test_kho: always print restore status
2025-11-18 18:10 [PATCH] test_kho: always print restore status Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-18 20:31 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-19 7:13 ` Mike Rapoport
@ 2025-11-20 1:18 ` SeongJae Park
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2025-11-20 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratyush Yadav
Cc: SeongJae Park, Andrew Morton, Alexander Graf, Mike Rapoport,
Pasha Tatashin, kexec, linux-mm, linux-kernel, SeongJae Park
On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 19:10:45 +0100 Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> wrote:
> Currently the KHO test only prints a message on success, and remains
> silent on failure. This makes it difficult to notice a failing test. A
> failing test is usually more interesting than a successful one.
>
> Always print the test status after attempting restore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kerneel.org>
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-20 1:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-18 18:10 [PATCH] test_kho: always print restore status Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-18 20:31 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-19 7:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-20 1:18 ` SeongJae Park
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox