linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/23] sched: psi: implement bpf_psi struct ops
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 07:40:09 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQD_-a8oWHfRKcrX@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027232206.473085-10-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>

Hello,

On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 04:22:03PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> This patch implements a BPF struct ops-based mechanism to create
> PSI triggers, attach them to cgroups or system wide and handle
> PSI events in BPF.
> 
> The struct ops provides 3 callbacks:
>   - init() called once at load, handy for creating PSI triggers
>   - handle_psi_event() called every time a PSI trigger fires
>   - handle_cgroup_online() called when a new cgroup is created
>   - handle_cgroup_offline() called if a cgroup with an attached
>     trigger is deleted
> 
> A single struct ops can create a number of PSI triggers, both
> cgroup-scoped and system-wide.
> 
> All 4 struct ops callbacks can be sleepable. handle_psi_event()
> handlers are executed using a separate workqueue, so it won't
> affect the latency of other PSI triggers.

Here, too, I wonder whether it's necessary to build a hard-coded
infrastructure to hook into PSI's triggers. psi_avgs_work() is what triggers
these events and it's not that hot. Wouldn't a fexit attachment to that
function that reads the updated values be enough? We can also easily add a
TP there if a more structured access is desirable.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-28 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-27 23:21 [PATCH v2 11/23] mm: introduce BPF kfunc to access memory events Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] bpf: selftests: selftests for memcg stat kfuncs Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] mm: introduce bpf_out_of_memory() BPF kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:57   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 16:43     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-10  9:46   ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-11 19:13     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-12  7:50       ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for BPF triggers Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 15:58     ` Chris Mason
2025-10-28 16:20       ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 16:35         ` Chris Mason
2025-11-10  9:31   ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-11 19:17     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-12  7:52       ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] mm: introduce bpf_task_is_oom_victim() kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 17:32   ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-28 18:09     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 18:31       ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] libbpf: introduce bpf_map__attach_struct_ops_opts() Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 17:07     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 17:24       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] bpf: selftests: introduce read_cgroup_file() helper Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 16:31     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] bpf: selftests: BPF OOM handler test Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] sched: psi: refactor psi_trigger_create() Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] sched: psi: implement bpf_psi struct ops Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 17:40   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2025-10-28 18:29     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 18:35       ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-28 19:54         ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] sched: psi: implement bpf_psi_create_trigger() kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] bpf: selftests: add config for psi Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] bpf: selftests: PSI struct ops test Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 17:13     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 17:30       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-10  9:48   ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-11 19:03     ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQD_-a8oWHfRKcrX@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox