From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab: Fix obj_ext is mistakenly considered NULL due to race condition
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 17:54:08 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPs-sKOJQs-OelVM@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023143313.1327968-1-hao.ge@linux.dev>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:33:13PM +0800, Hao Ge wrote:
> From: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
>
> If two competing threads enter alloc_slab_obj_exts(), if the process
> that allocates the vector wins cmpxchg(), and the other thread mistakenly
> assume slab->obj_ext is still empty due to its own allocation failure.
Massaging this a little bit:
"If two competing threads enter alloc_slab_obj_exts(), and the one that
allocates the vector wins the cmpxchg(), the other thread that failed
allocation mistakenly assumes that slab->obj_exts is still empty due to
its own allocation failure."
> This
> will then trigger warnings enforced by CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG
> checks in the subsequent free path.
>
> Therefore, let's add an additional check when the process that allocates
> the vector loses the cmpxchg()
You mean "when the process that failed to allocate the vector loses the
cmpxchg()"?
> Suggested-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> v2: Revise the solution according to Harry's suggestion.
> Add Suggested-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> ---
>
> mm/slub.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index d4403341c9df..d7bfec6c0171 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2052,9 +2052,9 @@ static inline void mark_objexts_empty(struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts)
> }
> }
>
> -static inline void mark_failed_objexts_alloc(struct slab *slab)
> +static inline bool mark_failed_objexts_alloc(struct slab *slab)
> {
> - cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, 0, OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL);
> + return cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, 0, OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL) == 0;
> }
>
> static inline void handle_failed_objexts_alloc(unsigned long obj_exts,
> @@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ static inline void handle_failed_objexts_alloc(unsigned long obj_exts,
> #else /* CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG */
>
> static inline void mark_objexts_empty(struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts) {}
> -static inline void mark_failed_objexts_alloc(struct slab *slab) {}
> +static inline bool mark_failed_objexts_alloc(struct slab *slab) { return false; }
> static inline void handle_failed_objexts_alloc(unsigned long obj_exts,
> struct slabobj_ext *vec, unsigned int objects) {}
>
> @@ -2124,8 +2124,14 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
> slab_nid(slab));
> }
> if (!vec) {
> - /* Mark vectors which failed to allocate */
> - mark_failed_objexts_alloc(slab);
> + /*
> + * Try to mark vectors which failed to allocate
nit:
^ missing
period
(.) here
With the comments resolved,
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> + * If this operation fails, there may be a racing process
> + * that has already completed the allocation.
> + */
> + if (!mark_failed_objexts_alloc(slab) &&
> + slab_obj_exts(slab))
> + return 0;
>
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-23 14:33 Hao Ge
2025-10-23 16:33 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-10-24 8:54 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2025-10-24 9:27 ` Hao Ge
2025-10-24 9:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 10:06 ` Hao Ge
2025-10-24 10:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPs-sKOJQs-OelVM@hyeyoo \
--to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=gehao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox