linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, brauner@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	graf@amazon.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	masahiroy@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 5/7] kho: don't unpreserve memory during abort
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 10:20:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPnXVmD3cNmYNRF_@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mafs0a51jfar1.fsf@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 01:15:30PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> 
> > KHO allows clients to preserve memory regions at any point before the
> > KHO state is finalized. The finalization process itself involves KHO
> > performing its own actions, such as serializing the overall
> > preserved memory map.
> >
> > If this finalization process is aborted, the current implementation
> > destroys KHO's internal memory tracking structures
> > (`kho_out.ser.track.orders`). This behavior effectively unpreserves
> > all memory from KHO's perspective, regardless of whether those
> > preservations were made by clients before the finalization attempt
> > or by KHO itself during finalization.
> >
> > This premature unpreservation is incorrect. An abort of the
> > finalization process should only undo actions taken by KHO as part of
> > that specific finalization attempt. Individual memory regions
> > preserved by clients prior to finalization should remain preserved,
> > as their lifecycle is managed by the clients themselves. These
> > clients might still need to call kho_unpreserve_folio() or
> > kho_unpreserve_phys() based on their own logic, even after a KHO
> > finalization attempt is aborted.
> 
> I think you also need to update test_kho and reserve_mem to do this
> since right now they assume all memory gets unpreserved on failure.

I agree. 

> > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> > ---
> [...]
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Pratyush Yadav

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-23  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-22  0:57 [PATCHv7 0/7] liveupdate: Rework KHO for in-kernel users Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 1/7] kho: allow to drive kho from within kernel Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-23  7:13   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 2/7] kho: make debugfs interface optional Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22 10:31   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 3/7] kho: drop notifiers Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22 11:01   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24  6:16     ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-24  9:39       ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 13:11     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 15:50       ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 15:52         ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 16:15           ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 16:32             ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 4/7] kho: add interfaces to unpreserve folios and page ranges Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22 11:10   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 13:18     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-23  7:17   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 5/7] kho: don't unpreserve memory during abort Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22 11:15   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-23  7:20     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-10-24 13:28       ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 15:27         ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 15:33           ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 15:48             ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 6/7] liveupdate: kho: move to kernel/liveupdate Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 7/7] liveupdate: kho: move kho debugfs directory to liveupdate Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-23  7:32   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-24 13:33     ` Pasha Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aPnXVmD3cNmYNRF_@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox