linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, corbet@lwn.net, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	osalvador@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	laoar.shao@gmail.com, brauner@kernel.org, mclapinski@google.com,
	joel.granados@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm, hugetlb: remove hugepages_treat_as_movable sysctl"
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 11:29:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOfU9YTKMPWzYOta@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aOdSvriKRoCR5IUs@tiehlicka>

On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 08:14:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 08-10-25 12:31:22, Gregory Price wrote:
> > > I'm not quite clear yet on the use case, though. If all the user allocations
> > > end up fragmenting the memory, there is also not a lot of benefit to be had
> > > from that zone long term.
> > >
> > 
> > The only real use case i've seen is exactly: 
> >  - Don't want random GFP_KERNEL to land there
> >  - Might want it to be pinnable
> > 
> > I think that covers what you've described above.
> > 
> > But adding an entire zone felt a bit heavy handed.  Allowing gigantic in
> > movable seemed less - immediately - offensive.
> 
> The question is whether we need a full zone for that or we can control
> those allocation constrains on per memory block bases to override
> otherwise default. So it wouldn't be MOVABLE but rather something like
> USER zone.


Mild ignorance here - but I don't think the buddy allocator currently
differentiates chunks of memory based on block membership, it just eats
folios from certain zones/nodes.

I'm scratching my head trying to think of the discrete mechanism to do
this that doesn't inject significantly more complexity into the buddy
allocator.

Looking at the recent[1] THP support for ZONE_DEVICE, I wonder if we end
up with something more along these lines?  But this aschews the other
requirement of wanting the memory to be otherwise general purpose.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251001065707.920170-1-balbirs@nvidia.com/

ZONE_USER does feel like the most natural solution.  Literally just
(ZONE_NORMAL - GFP_KERNEL).  This might need a new GFP flag for certain
use cases like KVM (GFP_USER) to denote certain "This isn't technically
kernel memory, but it needs to be pinnable".  That would slot right
between ZONE_NORMAL and ZONE_MOVABLE.

Alternatively we could go the opposite way and introduce ZONE_KERNEL
below ZONE_NORMAL and disallow GFP_KERNEL from ZONE_NORMAL - then have
strict watermarks on ZONE_KERNEL to ensure the kernel is always able
to get memory. 

~Gregory


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-09 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-07 21:44 Gregory Price
2025-10-07 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-07 22:12   ` Gregory Price
2025-10-08  8:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 14:18   ` Gregory Price
2025-10-08 14:44     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 18:58       ` Gregory Price
2025-10-08 19:01         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 19:44           ` Gregory Price
2025-10-08 19:52             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 19:59               ` Gregory Price
2025-10-08 14:59   ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-08 15:14     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 15:23       ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-08 15:43         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 16:31           ` Gregory Price
2025-10-09  6:14             ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-09 15:29               ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-10-09 18:47                 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-09 18:51                 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 21:31                   ` Gregory Price
2025-10-10  7:40                     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-10 18:53                       ` Gregory Price
2025-10-08 16:08     ` Frank van der Linden
2025-10-08 16:39       ` Gregory Price
2025-10-08 17:05       ` Gregory Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aOfU9YTKMPWzYOta@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=00moses.alexander00@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mclapinski@google.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox