From: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Support dynamic (de)configuration of memory
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:30:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOUj_RE8z9OiIIfN@li-2b55cdcc-350b-11b2-a85c-a78bff51fc11.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250926131527.3260733-1-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 03:15:23PM +0200, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patchset provides a new interface for dynamic configuration and
> deconfiguration of hotplug memory on s390, allowing with/without
> memmap_on_memory support. It is a follow up on the discussion with David
> when introducing memmap_on_memory support for s390 and support dynamic
> (de)configuration of memory:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ee492da8-74b4-4a97-8b24-73e07257f01d@redhat.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241202082732.3959803-1-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com/
>
> The original motivation for introducing memmap_on_memory on s390 was to
> avoid using online memory to store struct pages metadata, particularly
> for standby memory blocks. This became critical in cases where there was
> an imbalance between standby and online memory, potentially leading to
> boot failures due to insufficient memory for metadata allocation.
>
> To address this, memmap_on_memory was utilized on s390. However, in its
> current form, it adds struct pages metadata at the start of each memory
> block at the time of addition (only standby memory), and this
> configuration is static. It cannot be changed at runtime (When the user
> needs continuous physical memory).
>
> Inorder to provide more flexibility to the user and overcome the above
> limitation, add an option to dynamically configure and deconfigure
> hotpluggable memory block with/without memmap_on_memory.
>
> With the new interface, s390 will not add all possible hotplug memory in
> advance, like before, to make it visible in sysfs for online/offline
> actions. Instead, before memory block can be set online, it has to be
> configured via a new interface in /sys/firmware/memory/memoryX/config,
> which makes s390 similar to others. i.e. Adding of hotpluggable memory is
> controlled by the user instead of adding it at boottime.
Hi David,
Looking forward to your feedback to proceed further.
Thank you,
Sumanth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-26 13:15 Sumanth Korikkar
2025-09-26 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] s390/mm: Support removal of boot-allocated virtual memory map Sumanth Korikkar
2025-09-26 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] s390/sclp: Add support for dynamic (de)configuration of memory Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-07 20:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 6:46 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-08 8:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-26 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] s390/sclp: Remove MHP_OFFLINE_INACCESSIBLE Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-07 19:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-26 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove MEM_PREPARE_ONLINE/MEM_FINISH_OFFLINE notifiers Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-07 14:30 ` Sumanth Korikkar [this message]
2025-10-07 16:02 ` [PATCH 0/4] Support dynamic (de)configuration of memory David Hildenbrand
2025-10-07 16:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-07 17:56 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-07 19:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 6:05 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-08 8:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 9:12 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-10-08 9:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 9:13 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-08 9:33 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aOUj_RE8z9OiIIfN@li-2b55cdcc-350b-11b2-a85c-a78bff51fc11.ibm.com \
--to=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox