From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] mm/vmalloc: Update __vmalloc_node_range() documentation
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 11:42:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOTgcZWGlcx1TeDX@milan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aOPBePFxNk5FP/ru@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 09:17:44PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 10/06/25 at 12:06pm, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 04, 2025 at 01:02:02PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > On 10/04/25 at 12:11pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > On 10/01/25 at 09:26pm, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > > > > __vmalloc() function now supports non-blocking flags such as
> > > > > GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_NOWAIT. Update the documentation accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > mm/vmalloc.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > > > > index d7e7049e01f8..2b45cd4ce119 100644
> > > > > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> > > > > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > > > > @@ -3881,19 +3881,20 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > > > > * @caller: caller's return address
> > > > > *
> > > > > * Allocate enough pages to cover @size from the page level
> > > > > - * allocator with @gfp_mask flags. Please note that the full set of gfp
> > > > > - * flags are not supported. GFP_KERNEL, GFP_NOFS and GFP_NOIO are all
> > > > > - * supported.
> > > > > - * Zone modifiers are not supported. From the reclaim modifiers
> > > > > - * __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is required (aka GFP_NOWAIT is not supported)
> > > > > - * and only __GFP_NOFAIL is supported (i.e. __GFP_NORETRY and
> > > > > - * __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL are not supported).
> > > > > + * allocator with @gfp_mask flags and map them into contiguous
> > > > > + * virtual range with protection @prot.
> > > > > *
> > > > > - * __GFP_NOWARN can be used to suppress failures messages.
> > > > > + * Supported GFP classes: %GFP_KERNEL, %GFP_ATOMIC, %GFP_NOWAIT,
> > > > > + * %GFP_NOFS and %GFP_NOIO. Zone modifiers are not supported.
> > > > > + * Please note %GFP_ATOMIC and %GFP_NOWAIT are supported only
> > > > > + * by __vmalloc().
> > > > > +
> > > > > + * Retry modifiers: only %__GFP_NOFAIL is supported; %__GFP_NORETRY
> > > > > + * and %__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL are not supported.
> > > >
> > > > Do we need to update the documentation of __vmalloc_node_noprof()
> > > > accordingly? I see it has below description about "Retry modifiers"
> > > > where gfp_mask is passed down to __vmalloc_node_range_noprof() directly
> > > > but have different description. Not sure if I missed anything.
> > > >
> > > > ===
> > > > * Retry modifiers: only %__GFP_NOFAIL is supported; %__GFP_NORETRY
> > > > * and %__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL are not supported.
> > > > ===
> > >
> > > Sorry, I copied the wrong sentences. Below is copied from documentation
> > > of __vmalloc_node_noprof().
> > > ====
> > > * Reclaim modifiers in @gfp_mask - __GFP_NORETRY, __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
> > > * and __GFP_NOFAIL are not supported
> > > ====
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > *
> > > > > - * Map them into contiguous kernel virtual space, using a pagetable
> > > > > - * protection of @prot.
> > > > > + * %__GFP_NOWARN can be used to suppress failure messages.
> > > > > *
> > > > > + * Can not be called from interrupt nor NMI contexts.
> > > > > * Return: the address of the area or %NULL on failure
> > > > > */
> > > > > void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.47.3
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > We need. But i am not sure it should be fully copy-pasted from the
> > __vmalloc_node_range_noprof(). At least __GFP_NOFAIL is supported
> > and thus stating that it is not - is wrong.
> >
> > It has to be fixed but not by this series because when __GFP_NOFAIL
> > support was introduced the doc. should have to be updated accordingly.
>
> Maybe just remove the documentation for __vmalloc_node_noprof() since
> it's only a wrapper of __vmalloc_node_range_noprof()? Surely this should
> be done in another standalone patch later.
>
Like below?
<snip>
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 9a63c91c6150..7ff81a38dcb8 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -4027,12 +4027,8 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
* Allocate enough pages to cover @size from the page level allocator with
* @gfp_mask flags. Map them into contiguous kernel virtual space.
*
- * Reclaim modifiers in @gfp_mask - __GFP_NORETRY, __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
- * and __GFP_NOFAIL are not supported
- *
- * Any use of gfp flags outside of GFP_KERNEL should be consulted
- * with mm people.
- *
+ * For detailed information about supported GFP flags and retry modifiers,
+ * see the __vmalloc_node_range_noprof() function description.
* Return: pointer to the allocated memory or %NULL on error
*/
void *__vmalloc_node_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
<snip>
--
Uladzislau Rezki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-01 19:26 [PATCH v3 00/10] __vmalloc()/kvmalloc() and no-block support(v3) Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] lib/test_vmalloc: add no_block_alloc_test case Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] lib/test_vmalloc: Remove xfail condition check Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] mm/vmalloc: Support non-blocking GFP flags in alloc_vmap_area() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mm/vmalloc: Defer freeing partly initialized vm_struct Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mm/vmalloc: Handle non-blocking GFP in __vmalloc_area_node() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mm/kasan: Support non-blocking GFP in kasan_populate_vmalloc() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] kmsan: Remove hard-coded GFP_KERNEL flags Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mm: Skip might_alloc() warnings when PF_MEMALLOC is set Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-04 3:53 ` Baoquan He
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mm/vmalloc: Update __vmalloc_node_range() documentation Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-04 4:11 ` Baoquan He
2025-10-04 5:02 ` Baoquan He
2025-10-06 10:06 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-10-06 13:17 ` Baoquan He
2025-10-07 9:42 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2025-10-07 9:53 ` Baoquan He
2025-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mm: kvmalloc: Add non-blocking support for vmalloc Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-03 6:30 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-04 4:37 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aOTgcZWGlcx1TeDX@milan \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox