linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: ranxiaokai627@163.com
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@gentwo.org,
	rientjes@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	usamaarif642@gmail.com, surenb@google.com,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] alloc_tag: Fix boot failure due to NULL pointer dereference
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 17:54:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNZUx5J-atXpKHnY@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250926080659.741991-1-ranxiaokai627@163.com>

On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 08:06:59AM +0000, ranxiaokai627@163.com wrote:
> From: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> 
> There is a boot failure when both CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK and
> CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING are enabled.
> 
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> RIP: 0010:__alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0x181/0x2f0
> Call Trace:
>  kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x1c8/0x5c0
>  __alloc_object+0x2f/0x290
>  __create_object+0x22/0x80
>  kmemleak_init+0x122/0x190
>  mm_core_init+0xb6/0x160
>  start_kernel+0x39f/0x920
>  x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30
>  x86_64_start_kernel+0x104/0x120
>  common_startup_64+0x12c/0x138
> 
> In kmemleak, mem_pool_alloc() directly calls kmem_cache_alloc_noprof(),
> as a result, the alloc_tag structure associated with object_cache is not
> defined neither initialized.

nit: "the alloc_tag structure associated with object_cache is not
defined neither initialized" sounds weird because here we're talking
about current->alloc_tag being NULL, and it is not something we
associate with a slab cache.

> So current->alloc_tag is NULL,
> leading to a null pointer dereference.

> Move the checks for SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT, SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE, and
> __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT to the parent function __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook()
> to fix this.
> 
> Also this distinguishes the SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE case between the actual memory
> allocation failures case, make CODETAG_FLAG_INACCURATE more accurate.
> 
> Fixes: b9e2f58ffb84 ("alloc_tag: mark inaccurate allocation counters in /proc/allocinfo output")
> Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> ---

In general, the fix makes sense and looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon

>  mm/slub.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 867a07260acf..09cbe580842c 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2197,15 +2197,6 @@ prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, void *p)
>  {
>  	struct slab *slab;
>  
> -	if (!p)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	if (s->flags & (SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT | SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE))
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	if (flags & __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT)
> -		return NULL;
> -
>  	slab = virt_to_slab(p);
>  	if (!slab_obj_exts(slab) &&
>  	    alloc_slab_obj_exts(slab, s, flags, false)) {
> @@ -2223,6 +2214,15 @@ __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object, gfp_t flags)
>  {
>  	struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts;
>  
> +	if (!object)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (s->flags & (SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT | SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (flags & __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT)
> +		return;
> +
>  	obj_exts = prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook(s, flags, object);
>  	/*
>  	 * Currently obj_exts is used only for allocation profiling.
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-26  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-26  8:06 ranxiaokai627
2025-09-26  8:54 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2025-09-26 12:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-26 15:36   ` Suren Baghdasaryan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNZUx5J-atXpKHnY@hyeyoo \
    --to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=ranxiaokai627@163.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox