From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: ranxiaokai627@163.com
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@gentwo.org,
rientjes@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
usamaarif642@gmail.com, surenb@google.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] alloc_tag: Fix boot failure due to NULL pointer dereference
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 17:54:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNZUx5J-atXpKHnY@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250926080659.741991-1-ranxiaokai627@163.com>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 08:06:59AM +0000, ranxiaokai627@163.com wrote:
> From: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
>
> There is a boot failure when both CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK and
> CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING are enabled.
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> RIP: 0010:__alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0x181/0x2f0
> Call Trace:
> kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x1c8/0x5c0
> __alloc_object+0x2f/0x290
> __create_object+0x22/0x80
> kmemleak_init+0x122/0x190
> mm_core_init+0xb6/0x160
> start_kernel+0x39f/0x920
> x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30
> x86_64_start_kernel+0x104/0x120
> common_startup_64+0x12c/0x138
>
> In kmemleak, mem_pool_alloc() directly calls kmem_cache_alloc_noprof(),
> as a result, the alloc_tag structure associated with object_cache is not
> defined neither initialized.
nit: "the alloc_tag structure associated with object_cache is not
defined neither initialized" sounds weird because here we're talking
about current->alloc_tag being NULL, and it is not something we
associate with a slab cache.
> So current->alloc_tag is NULL,
> leading to a null pointer dereference.
> Move the checks for SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT, SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE, and
> __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT to the parent function __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook()
> to fix this.
>
> Also this distinguishes the SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE case between the actual memory
> allocation failures case, make CODETAG_FLAG_INACCURATE more accurate.
>
> Fixes: b9e2f58ffb84 ("alloc_tag: mark inaccurate allocation counters in /proc/allocinfo output")
> Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> ---
In general, the fix makes sense and looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
> mm/slub.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 867a07260acf..09cbe580842c 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2197,15 +2197,6 @@ prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, void *p)
> {
> struct slab *slab;
>
> - if (!p)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - if (s->flags & (SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT | SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE))
> - return NULL;
> -
> - if (flags & __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT)
> - return NULL;
> -
> slab = virt_to_slab(p);
> if (!slab_obj_exts(slab) &&
> alloc_slab_obj_exts(slab, s, flags, false)) {
> @@ -2223,6 +2214,15 @@ __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object, gfp_t flags)
> {
> struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts;
>
> + if (!object)
> + return;
> +
> + if (s->flags & (SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT | SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE))
> + return;
> +
> + if (flags & __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT)
> + return;
> +
> obj_exts = prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook(s, flags, object);
> /*
> * Currently obj_exts is used only for allocation profiling.
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-26 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-26 8:06 ranxiaokai627
2025-09-26 8:54 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2025-09-26 12:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-26 15:36 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNZUx5J-atXpKHnY@hyeyoo \
--to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=ranxiaokai627@163.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox