linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, clm@meta.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, alison.schofield@intel.com,
	dakr@kernel.org, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com, yury.norov@gmail.com,
	ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/base/node: Fix double free in register_one_node()
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:28:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMwI8n2-w1J_AOiD@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5512b1b6-31f8-4322-8a5f-add8d1e9b22f@redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 07:55:07AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Yes, that matches what other users (staring at mm/memory-tiers.c) do.
> 
> I wonder if we should just inline register_node() into register_one_node().
> 
> Then it's clearer that we perform a put_device() already in there.
> 
> On top of that, we could then just s/register_one_node/register_node/
> 
> And then we could do a similar cleanup for unregister_one_node /
> unregister_node where I don't consider the split function really valuable.

Yap, that makes sense to me as well.

 

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-18 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-18  5:41 Donet Tom
2025-09-18  5:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-18  5:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-18  6:45   ` Donet Tom
2025-09-18 13:28   ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2025-09-18 13:29 ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMwI8n2-w1J_AOiD@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox