From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <me@yadavpratyush.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kho: add support for preserving vmalloc allocations
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:36:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMhAiR6qnXMA-c8r@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250915144335.GL1024672@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:43:35AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 05:12:27PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > I don't suppose I'd insist on it, but something to consider since you
> > > are likely going to do another revision anyway.
> >
> > I think vmalloc is as basic as folio.
>
> vmalloc() ultimately calls vm_area_alloc_pages() -> alloc_pages_bulk_node_noprof()
>
> KHO should have functions that clearly pair with the low level
> allocators struct page related allocators, alloc_pages(order),
> folio_alloc(), etc etc
>
> ie if you call this allocator X then you call this kho preserve, this
> kho restore, and this free function Y.
>
> Under the covers it all uses the generic folio based code we already
> have, but we should have appropriate wrappers around that code that
> make clear these patterns.
Right, but that does not mean that vmalloc preserve/restore should use the
public KHO APIs and avoid using internal methods.
> Jason
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 10:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] " Mike Rapoport
2025-09-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Mike Rapoport
2025-09-08 14:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-15 14:01 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-15 14:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-15 16:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-08 18:12 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-09-08 18:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09 14:33 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-09-15 14:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-15 14:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-15 16:36 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-09-16 13:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 13:21 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-09-16 14:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-16 12:48 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-09-16 14:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-15 14:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-16 12:43 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-09-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] lib/test_kho: use kho_preserve_vmalloc instead of storing addresses in fdt Mike Rapoport
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-07 7:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] kho: add support for preserving vmalloc allocations Mike Rapoport
2025-09-07 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMhAiR6qnXMA-c8r@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=me@yadavpratyush.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox