linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] slab: validate slab before using it in alloc_single_from_partial()
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:48:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMP6f_fJ27flhdSq@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250911-slub-slab-validation-v1-5-8b67eb3b3dc5@suse.cz>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 07:02:38PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> We touch slab->freelist and slab->inuse before checking the slab pointer
> is actually sane. Do that validation first, which will be safer. We can
> thus also remove the check from alloc_debug_processing().
> 
> This adds a new "s->flags & SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS" test but
> alloc_single_from_partial() is only called for caches with debugging
> enabled so it's acceptable.
> 
> In alloc_single_from_new_slab() we just created the struct slab and call
> alloc_debug_processing() to mainly set up redzones, tracking etc, while
> not really expecting the consistency checks to fail. Thus don't validate
> it there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
>  mm/slub.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 909c71372a2f542b6e0d67c12ea683133b246b66..93df6e82af37c798c3fa5574c9d825f0f4a83013 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1651,11 +1651,6 @@ static noinline bool alloc_debug_processing(struct kmem_cache *s,
>  			struct slab *slab, void *object, int orig_size)
>  {
>  	if (s->flags & SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS) {
> -		if (!validate_slab_ptr(slab)) {
> -			slab_err(s, slab, "Not a valid slab page");
> -			return false;
> -		}
> -
>  		if (!alloc_consistency_checks(s, slab, object))
>  			goto bad;
>  	}
> @@ -2825,15 +2820,19 @@ static void *alloc_single_from_partial(struct kmem_cache *s,
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&n->list_lock);
>  
> +	if (s->flags & SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS) {
> +		if (!validate_slab_ptr(slab)) {
> +			slab_err(s, slab, "Not a valid slab page");
> +			return NULL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	object = slab->freelist;
>  	slab->freelist = get_freepointer(s, object);
>  	slab->inuse++;
>  
> -	if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, slab, object, orig_size)) {
> -		if (validate_slab_ptr(slab))
> -			remove_partial(n, slab);
> +	if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, slab, object, orig_size))
>  		return NULL;

Is it intentional to not remove the slab from the partial list
when alloc_debug_processing() returns false?

> -	}
>  
>  	if (slab->inuse == slab->objects) {
>  		remove_partial(n, slab);
> 
> -- 
> 2.51.0

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-12 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-11 17:02 [PATCH 0/6] slab: struct slab pointer validation improvements Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] slab: Remove dead code in free_consistency_checks() Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] slab: wrap debug slab validation in validate_slab_ptr() Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-12 10:20   ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] slab: move validate_slab_ptr() from check_slab() to its callers Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-12 10:24   ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] slab: move validate_slab_ptr() from alloc_consistency_checks() to its caller Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-12 10:41   ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] slab: validate slab before using it in alloc_single_from_partial() Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-12 10:48   ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2025-09-12 11:34     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] slab: don't validate slab pointer in free_debug_processing() Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-12 10:52   ` Harry Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMP6f_fJ27flhdSq@hyeyoo \
    --to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox