From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: syzbot ci <syzbot+ciac51bb7578ba7c59@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, boqun.feng@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
corbet@lwn.net, davem@davemloft.net, dvyukov@google.com,
edumazet@google.com, frederic@kernel.org, glider@google.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hch@lst.de,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, irogers@google.com,
jannh@google.com, joelagnelf@nvidia.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
justinstitt@google.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
kees@kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
longman@redhat.com, luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com,
lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, mingo@kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, morbo@google.com, nathan@kernel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, nick.desaulniers@gmail.com,
ojeda@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, peterz@infradead.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, takedakn@nttdata.co.jp,
tglx@linutronix.de, tgraf@suug.ch, urezki@gmail.com,
will@kernel.org, syzbot@lists.linux.dev,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot ci] Re: Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 09:05:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aM0A0p4-3lwLeAWF@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68cc6067.a00a0220.37dadf.0003.GAE@google.com>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 12:41PM -0700, syzbot ci wrote:
> syzbot ci has tested the following series
>
> [v3] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis
[...]
> and found the following issue:
> general protection fault in validate_page_before_insert
>
> Full report is available here:
> https://ci.syzbot.org/series/81182522-74c0-4494-bcf8-976133df7dc7
>
> ***
>
> general protection fault in validate_page_before_insert
Thanks, syzbot ci!
I messed up the type when moving kcov->area access inside the critical
section. This is the fix:
fixup! kcov: Enable capability analysis
diff --git a/kernel/kcov.c b/kernel/kcov.c
index 1897c8ca6209..e81e3c0d01c6 100644
--- a/kernel/kcov.c
+++ b/kernel/kcov.c
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int kcov_mmap(struct file *filep, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
unsigned long size, off;
struct page *page;
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned long *area;
+ void *area;
spin_lock_irqsave(&kcov->lock, flags);
size = kcov->size * sizeof(unsigned long);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 13:59 [PATCH v3 00/35] " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/35] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 15:58 ` Ian Rogers
2025-09-18 16:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-18 16:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/35] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/35] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-09-18 20:36 ` Joe Perches
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/35] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/35] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/35] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/35] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/35] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/35] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/35] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/35] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 15/35] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/35] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 17/35] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 18/35] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 19/35] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 20/35] locking/ww_mutex: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 21/35] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 22/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 23/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 24/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 25/35] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 26/35] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 27/35] kfence: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 28/35] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 29/35] kcsan: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 30/35] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 31/35] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 32/35] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 33/35] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 34/35] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 35/35] sched: Enable capability analysis for core.c and fair.c Marco Elver
2025-09-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v3 00/35] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-18 14:30 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 14:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-18 17:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-18 19:40 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-19 14:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-19 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-22 9:33 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-22 17:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-23 19:49 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-19 17:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-22 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-20 10:23 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-20 12:44 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 15:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-09-18 21:26 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-09-19 9:10 ` Marco Elver
2025-11-13 14:30 ` Marco Elver
2025-11-14 4:38 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-11-14 13:22 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 16:21 ` Ian Rogers
2025-09-18 19:41 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2025-09-19 7:05 ` Marco Elver [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aM0A0p4-3lwLeAWF@elver.google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=syzbot+ciac51bb7578ba7c59@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzbot@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox