From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/18] mm/ksw: add /proc/kstackwatch interface
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:51:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLlFDQkWBF0N7xmk@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904002126.1514566-4-wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 08:21:00AM +0800, Jinchao Wang wrote:
> Provide the /proc/kstackwatch file to read or update the KSW configuration.
> Writing a valid config string starts watching; empty input stops watching.
> Invalid input stops watching and reports an error.
>
> Allocate a ksw_config struct on module init and free it on exit.
> Manage watching state with ksw_start_watching() and ksw_stop_watching().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/kstackwatch/kernel.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kstackwatch/kernel.c b/mm/kstackwatch/kernel.c
> index 4a6dc49449fe..95ade95abde1 100644
> --- a/mm/kstackwatch/kernel.c
> +++ b/mm/kstackwatch/kernel.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> #include <linux/kstrtox.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>
> #include "kstackwatch.h"
>
> @@ -9,6 +12,29 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Jinchao Wang");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Kernel Stack Watch");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> +struct ksw_config *ksw_config;
Does a global ksw_config imply that this is a singleton?
What happens when there are several "echo .. > /proc/kstackwatch"?
And even more interesting what happens if they are parallel?
> +bool watching_active;
> +
> +bool panic_on_catch;
> +module_param(panic_on_catch, bool, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(panic_on_catch,
> + "Trigger a kernel panic immediately on corruption catch");
> +
> +static int ksw_start_watching(void)
> +{
> + watching_active = true;
> +
> + pr_info("KSW: start watching %s\n", ksw_config->config_str);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ksw_stop_watching(void)
> +{
> + watching_active = false;
> +
> + pr_info("KSW: stop watching %s\n", ksw_config->config_str);
This module is overly verbose. Do you really need all the printks?
> +}
...
> static int __init kstackwatch_init(void)
> {
> + ksw_config = kmalloc(sizeof(*ksw_config), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ksw_config)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Create proc interface */
> + if (!proc_create("kstackwatch", 0644, NULL, &kstackwatch_proc_ops)) {
ksw_config must be freed here
> + pr_err("KSW: create proc kstackwatch fail");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> pr_info("KSW: module loaded\n");
> pr_info("KSW: usage:\n");
> pr_info("KSW: echo 'function+ip_offset[+depth] [local_var_offset:local_var_len]' > /proc/kstackwatch\n");
> @@ -85,6 +217,14 @@ static int __init kstackwatch_init(void)
>
> static void __exit kstackwatch_exit(void)
> {
> + /* Cleanup active watching */
> + if (watching_active)
> + ksw_stop_watching();
> +
> + /* Remove proc interface */
> + remove_proc_entry("kstackwatch", NULL);
> + kfree(ksw_config);
> +
> pr_info("KSW: Module unloaded\n");
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-04 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 0:20 [PATCH v2 00/18] mm/ksw: Introduce real-time Kernel Stack Watch debugging tool Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] mm/ksw: add build system support Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 7:46 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-08 5:48 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:20 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] mm/ksw: add ksw_config struct and parser Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 7:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-08 5:58 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] mm/ksw: add /proc/kstackwatch interface Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 7:51 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-09-08 6:03 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] mm/ksw: add HWBP pre-allocation support Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] x86/hw_breakpoint: introduce arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint() for atomic context Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 6:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-08 5:20 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-09-09 8:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-09-09 8:39 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-09-10 9:54 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] perf/hw_breakpoint: add arch-independent hw_breakpoint_modify_local() Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 6:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-08 5:36 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-09-05 16:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-05 17:31 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] mm/ksw: add atomic watch on/off operations Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 6:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-08 5:23 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] mm/ksw: add stack probe support Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] mm/ksw: implement stack canary and local var resolution logic Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] mm/ksw: add per-task recursion depth tracking Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] mm/ksw: coordinate watch and stack for full functionality Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] mm/ksw: add self-debug functions for kstackwatch watch Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] mm/ksw: add test module Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] mm/ksw: add stack overflow test Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] mm/ksw: add simplified silent corruption test Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] mm/ksw: add recursive " Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] tools/kstackwatch: add interactive test script for KStackWatch Jinchao Wang
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] MAINTAINERS: add entry for KStackWatch (Kernel Stack Watch) Jinchao Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLlFDQkWBF0N7xmk@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangjinchao600@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox