From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C0F0CA1009 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 18:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 54EAA8E0002; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:44:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4FF548E0001; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:44:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 414A28E0002; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:44:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C7B8E0001 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:44:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DFCBB9DC for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 18:44:09 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83848813818.23.427F7BB Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D3040015 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 18:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LrNIVQLF; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of bfoster@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bfoster@redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1756925048; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=VQA24N10fT9Pefj42vjvBVUY/+sJ6rXv6/JolCfoQ9GtiL3o9YZy18Gyz3jO3kIVy50orF vEqVO4ETPvqXJacCXS5Up2HsLYXDrHHFxGb1EqO7DqVroosbakgb9Ds+jg8wu5H6eQwFoO Ydpw2/61cWTV2/9TEQd5Kit/TDHldV0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LrNIVQLF; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of bfoster@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bfoster@redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1756925048; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=IpesNG/xAl2hZY5d1Hciez0SX4IFVTS/HvxVHV7ixlU=; b=EfAfAtqjjjjaWAGZkQyORYFrptQnVryY57RRaH6RekSu4uspujnnDhui7GWpDz9qjNyMze mvTpW2mhz6yTqNP49CZwI+Xm5krXWDGTlnWz7H072qhIpncj1mKne4BmjdV99cvLJYuVL7 tTsQBquBHMq/SQtRvXi6vrqZoXUQbxM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1756925047; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IpesNG/xAl2hZY5d1Hciez0SX4IFVTS/HvxVHV7ixlU=; b=LrNIVQLFLhT/Yfr/VJPA1bPEMMFiWtwiEwFNlSSo/+m4ciEaxcSUqrQ62RchVrEry91Ivi Q8iqBq8zz0rh9WzFEjPq185+CNON52fW0pMyCRat/plttzcEAUWJ2rOInQitmdhO+T32Pi 63XE2Z4xHoQv2KjB7cZ1bHkmPK0Pp6A= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-518-amsZ2VZQN4mRQ89bEiCdGA-1; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 14:44:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: amsZ2VZQN4mRQ89bEiCdGA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: amsZ2VZQN4mRQ89bEiCdGA_1756925042 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03614180034A; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 18:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bfoster (unknown [10.22.88.143]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9DC300021A; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 18:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:48:01 -0400 From: Brian Foster To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Joanne Koong , linux-mm@kvack.org, brauner@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org, jlayton@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] iomap: add granular dirty and writeback accounting Message-ID: References: <20250829233942.3607248-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> <20250829233942.3607248-13-joannelkoong@gmail.com> <20250902234604.GC1587915@frogsfrogsfrogs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250902234604.GC1587915@frogsfrogsfrogs> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 01D3040015 X-Stat-Signature: oxpe47b1357wzg4qkp8w1u3rbn8msgdo X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-HE-Tag: 1756925047-989801 X-HE-Meta: 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 IK61n+fA vuFvEq7toPBgiAHYsen1oC4VUFJuZ3Su+89qdhie5qt2IWciVcUSx7/ZQUb9P2Vird3nFHBHUhj5nzhr/9AEz/OWl/EjVnaeiGYzTd/r4gktMZSjQup0ez9Ew/JS6x520IRI7V5ngWBNKZa+1zlvDt2UB4Th4O1sZGHDHNxE6CWzOeTwk4j2Oqf+LyrN39f1SDL6tWsuufSpQ/Ywgi+Q50USlWXjVHCA6gilCTEZ2HBs1ILVpSrxs4zXTIyChPD9BA03RtuQQ9bpx2ISFVVjYQ2JBX/UyCd4td2yol1NQiVmR9IILmFz3h4sW0nSQzLpMxgSFndIH2pjo3YOn2qX5Zz71PktwzrzgQnCVb20UHDPFSrEKmO+y/G1GVEXcqBwEgXkz7qgmb0PrHQ3W68KASEE61R3nXsS2LCHJRtKt3JxOfIQ= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote: > > Add granular dirty and writeback accounting for large folios. These > > stats are used by the mm layer for dirty balancing and throttling. > > Having granular dirty and writeback accounting helps prevent > > over-aggressive balancing and throttling. > > > > There are 4 places in iomap this commit affects: > > a) filemap dirtying, which now calls filemap_dirty_folio_pages() > > b) writeback_iter with setting the wbc->no_stats_accounting bit and > > calling clear_dirty_for_io_stats() > > c) starting writeback, which now calls __folio_start_writeback() > > d) ending writeback, which now calls folio_end_writeback_pages() > > > > This relies on using the ifs->state dirty bitmap to track dirty pages in > > the folio. As such, this can only be utilized on filesystems where the > > block size >= PAGE_SIZE. > > Er... is this statement correct? I thought that you wanted the granular > dirty page accounting when it's possible that individual sub-pages of a > folio could be dirty. > > If i_blocksize >= PAGE_SIZE, then we'll have set the min folio order and > there will be exactly one (large) folio for a single fsblock. Writeback > must happen in units of fsblocks, so there's no point in doing the extra > accounting calculations if there's only one fsblock. > > Waitaminute, I think the logic to decide if you're going to use the > granular accounting is: > > (folio_size > PAGE_SIZE && folio_size > i_blocksize) > > Hrm? > I'm also a little confused why this needs to be restricted to blocksize gte PAGE_SIZE. The lower level helpers all seem to be managing block ranges, and then apparently just want to be able to use that directly as a page count (for accounting purposes). Is there any reason the lower level functions couldn't return block units, then the higher level code can use a blocks_per_page or some such to translate that to a base page count..? As Darrick points out I assume you'd want to shortcut the folio_nr_pages() == 1 case to use a min page count of 1, but otherwise ISTM that would allow this to work with configs like 64k pagesize and 4k blocks as well. Am I missing something? Brian > > Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong > > --- > > fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > index 4f021dcaaffe..bf33a5361a39 100644 > > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ struct iomap_folio_state { > > spinlock_t state_lock; > > unsigned int read_bytes_pending; > > atomic_t write_bytes_pending; > > + /* number of pages being currently written back */ > > + unsigned nr_pages_writeback; > > > > /* > > * Each block has two bits in this bitmap: > > @@ -139,6 +141,29 @@ static unsigned ifs_next_clean_block(struct folio *folio, > > blks + start_blk) - blks; > > } > > > > +static unsigned ifs_count_dirty_pages(struct folio *folio) > > +{ > > + struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host; > > + unsigned block_size = i_blocksize(inode); > > + unsigned start_blk, end_blk; > > + unsigned blks, nblks = 0; > > + > > + start_blk = 0; > > + blks = i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio); > > + end_blk = (i_size_read(inode) - 1) >> inode->i_blkbits; > > + end_blk = min(end_blk, i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio) - 1); > > + > > + while (start_blk <= end_blk) { > > + start_blk = ifs_next_dirty_block(folio, start_blk, end_blk); > > + if (start_blk > end_blk) > > + break; > > Use your new helper? > > nblks = ifs_next_clean_block(folio, start_blk + 1, > end_blk) - start_blk? > > + nblks++; > > + start_blk++; > > + } > > + > > + return nblks * (block_size >> PAGE_SHIFT); > > I think this returns the number of dirty basepages in a given large > folio? If that's the case then shouldn't this return long, like > folio_nr_pages does? > > > +} > > + > > static unsigned ifs_find_dirty_range(struct folio *folio, > > struct iomap_folio_state *ifs, u64 *range_start, u64 range_end) > > { > > @@ -220,6 +245,58 @@ static void iomap_set_range_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len) > > ifs_set_range_dirty(folio, ifs, off, len); > > } > > > > +static long iomap_get_range_newly_dirtied(struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, > > + unsigned len) > > iomap_count_clean_pages() ? > > --D > > > +{ > > + struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host; > > + unsigned block_size = i_blocksize(inode); > > + unsigned start_blk, end_blk; > > + unsigned nblks = 0; > > + > > + start_blk = pos >> inode->i_blkbits; > > + end_blk = (pos + len - 1) >> inode->i_blkbits; > > + end_blk = min(end_blk, i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio) - 1); > > + > > + while (start_blk <= end_blk) { > > + /* count how many clean blocks there are */ > > + start_blk = ifs_next_clean_block(folio, start_blk, end_blk); > > + if (start_blk > end_blk) > > + break; > > + nblks++; > > + start_blk++; > > + } > > + > > + return nblks * (block_size >> PAGE_SHIFT); > > +} > > + > > +static bool iomap_granular_dirty_pages(struct folio *folio) > > +{ > > + struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private; > > + > > + if (!ifs) > > + return false; > > + > > + return i_blocksize(folio->mapping->host) >= PAGE_SIZE; > > +} > > + > > +static bool iomap_dirty_folio_range(struct address_space *mapping, > > + struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, unsigned len) > > +{ > > + long nr_new_dirty_pages; > > + > > + if (!iomap_granular_dirty_pages(folio)) { > > + iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, pos, len); > > + return filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio); > > + } > > + > > + nr_new_dirty_pages = iomap_get_range_newly_dirtied(folio, pos, len); > > + if (!nr_new_dirty_pages) > > + return false; > > + > > + iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, pos, len); > > + return filemap_dirty_folio_pages(mapping, folio, nr_new_dirty_pages); > > +} > > + > > static struct iomap_folio_state *ifs_alloc(struct inode *inode, > > struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags) > > { > > @@ -712,8 +789,7 @@ bool iomap_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio) > > size_t len = folio_size(folio); > > > > ifs_alloc(inode, folio, 0); > > - iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, 0, len); > > - return filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio); > > + return iomap_dirty_folio_range(mapping, folio, 0, len); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_dirty_folio); > > > > @@ -937,8 +1013,8 @@ static bool __iomap_write_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len, > > if (unlikely(copied < len && !folio_test_uptodate(folio))) > > return false; > > iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, offset_in_folio(folio, pos), len); > > - iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, offset_in_folio(folio, pos), copied); > > - filemap_dirty_folio(inode->i_mapping, folio); > > + iomap_dirty_folio_range(inode->i_mapping, folio, > > + offset_in_folio(folio, pos), copied); > > return true; > > } > > > > @@ -1613,6 +1689,29 @@ void iomap_start_folio_write(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio, > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_start_folio_write); > > > > +static void iomap_folio_start_writeback(struct folio *folio) > > +{ > > + struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private; > > + > > + if (!iomap_granular_dirty_pages(folio)) > > + return folio_start_writeback(folio); > > + > > + __folio_start_writeback(folio, false, ifs->nr_pages_writeback); > > +} > > + > > +static void iomap_folio_end_writeback(struct folio *folio) > > +{ > > + struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private; > > + long nr_pages_writeback; > > + > > + if (!iomap_granular_dirty_pages(folio)) > > + return folio_end_writeback(folio); > > + > > + nr_pages_writeback = ifs->nr_pages_writeback; > > + ifs->nr_pages_writeback = 0; > > + folio_end_writeback_pages(folio, nr_pages_writeback); > > +} > > + > > void iomap_finish_folio_write(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio, > > size_t len) > > { > > @@ -1622,7 +1721,7 @@ void iomap_finish_folio_write(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio, > > WARN_ON_ONCE(ifs && atomic_read(&ifs->write_bytes_pending) <= 0); > > > > if (!ifs || atomic_sub_and_test(len, &ifs->write_bytes_pending)) > > - folio_end_writeback(folio); > > + iomap_folio_end_writeback(folio); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_finish_folio_write); > > > > @@ -1710,6 +1809,21 @@ static bool iomap_writeback_handle_eof(struct folio *folio, struct inode *inode, > > return true; > > } > > > > +static void iomap_update_dirty_stats(struct folio *folio) > > +{ > > + struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private; > > + long nr_dirty_pages; > > + > > + if (iomap_granular_dirty_pages(folio)) { > > + nr_dirty_pages = ifs_count_dirty_pages(folio); > > + ifs->nr_pages_writeback = nr_dirty_pages; > > + } else { > > + nr_dirty_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio); > > + } > > + > > + clear_dirty_for_io_stats(folio, nr_dirty_pages); > > +} > > + > > int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio) > > { > > struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private; > > @@ -1727,6 +1841,8 @@ int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio) > > > > trace_iomap_writeback_folio(inode, pos, folio_size(folio)); > > > > + iomap_update_dirty_stats(folio); > > + > > if (!iomap_writeback_handle_eof(folio, inode, &end_pos)) > > return 0; > > WARN_ON_ONCE(end_pos <= pos); > > @@ -1734,6 +1850,7 @@ int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio) > > if (i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio) > 1) { > > if (!ifs) { > > ifs = ifs_alloc(inode, folio, 0); > > + ifs->nr_pages_writeback = folio_nr_pages(folio); > > iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, 0, end_pos - pos); > > } > > > > @@ -1751,7 +1868,7 @@ int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio) > > * Set the writeback bit ASAP, as the I/O completion for the single > > * block per folio case happen hit as soon as we're submitting the bio. > > */ > > - folio_start_writeback(folio); > > + iomap_folio_start_writeback(folio); > > > > /* > > * Walk through the folio to find dirty areas to write back. > > @@ -1784,10 +1901,10 @@ int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio) > > */ > > if (ifs) { > > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ifs->write_bytes_pending)) > > - folio_end_writeback(folio); > > + iomap_folio_end_writeback(folio); > > } else { > > if (!wb_pending) > > - folio_end_writeback(folio); > > + iomap_folio_end_writeback(folio); > > } > > mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, error); > > return error; > > @@ -1809,6 +1926,13 @@ iomap_writepages(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc) > > PF_MEMALLOC)) > > return -EIO; > > > > + /* > > + * iomap opts out of the default wbc stats accounting because it does > > + * its own granular dirty/writeback accounting (see > > + * iomap_update_dirty_stats()). > > + */ > > + wpc->wbc->no_stats_accounting = true; > > + > > while ((folio = writeback_iter(mapping, wpc->wbc, folio, &error))) { > > error = iomap_writeback_folio(wpc, folio); > > folio_unlock(folio); > > -- > > 2.47.3 > > > > >