From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12E8DCA1009 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 685348E0007; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 06:18:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 65C488E0001; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 06:18:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5992E8E0007; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 06:18:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489468E0001 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 06:18:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A7F59D3C for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:18:10 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83847538740.09.233C516 Received: from lgeamrelo07.lge.com (lgeamrelo07.lge.com [156.147.51.103]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997F81C0003 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf18.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lge.com; spf=pass (imf18.hostedemail.com: domain of youngjun.park@lge.com designates 156.147.51.103 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=youngjun.park@lge.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1756894689; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sJ65Befhlr72Ia3ZmnOetqt80T+UP+YkUCseLmOi+mg=; b=za/NyR4eGgJTJJlLCkeYa757px3yH8Oz+AXXJnLEG2DFqSIChyhvGkOYStxRiFoufdM6zt X1ZiVkiitkSd16bGHOwUdsBP94n6XcGWcMM156sfdyqCAvUWxXehVclUWr0fnIMDYI/Iky r/atAhAE9LeM2zdty7KphScil5H8bYo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf18.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lge.com; spf=pass (imf18.hostedemail.com: domain of youngjun.park@lge.com designates 156.147.51.103 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=youngjun.park@lge.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1756894689; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KQ/jfyXX7/UAjcxiAGuKIV0yO3afsrtJnej72IlFW5b9YmaD+WeCChsH0VHeUczKukbtbz LoO4oCtT3+6fptSR9Y49GN8ts+RF8PAVFh5KzFlOWOO/pNc3FiEaHcm7o6PfYhEwL12u62 WBnCy5ZauVv4htDXxSY7QTgY6xqExKc= Received: from unknown (HELO yjaykim-PowerEdge-T330) (10.177.112.156) by 156.147.51.103 with ESMTP; 3 Sep 2025 19:18:05 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.112.156 X-Original-MAILFROM: youngjun.park@lge.com Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 19:18:05 +0900 From: YoungJun Park To: Chris Li Cc: Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, kasong@tencent.com, nphamcs@gmail.com, bhe@redhat.com, baohua@kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gunho.lee@lge.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, taejoon.song@lge.com, Matthew Wilcox , David Hildenbrand , Kairui Song Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/swap, memcg: Introduce infrastructure for cgroup-based swap priority Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Stat-Signature: 9196s7obhbzgdknk5w4gqt8qjpmzgri7 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 997F81C0003 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-HE-Tag: 1756894688-740716 X-HE-Meta: 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 BkOiLgiH WB/AJOc0NEiMfBr0T62KRwE0wlkr5FdyTaCjhmddkI3iqgDo4j9yGvgMHGconw1WRDP4RhyG5BE5+R47QlKcC/pRoK7ENmYcsdQZZ69UoK0SfXPZY6vCi+k2ISbdOeqq1tPKF6+uJwPleaWtoJ952umZiW8DaH+H9rC5JgW1yLqGljg4ehXRJQxQpjQuSLlHZuu7yZmUaXeMPar/8AsIgTLJU3g== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Please accept the sincere apology from me. I was grumpy, sorry about > that. I was under pressure to be somewhere else but this email is > taking longer than I expected to write. I let my bad temper get the > better of me and I am sorry about that. > > You might not have realized that the proposal you made has the same > kind of buggy behavior for the usage case where the change of the > parent and the child gets it. > > One side note, I do want to rate limit the new proposals I have to > defend against. On the other hand, when you make a proposal to change, > you have no way to predict where I will consider it good or bad. > Otherwise we don't need to have this discussion. My hash reply is > uncalled for and I realized that now. > > I am over it now, let's put this behind us and continue our discussion. > > Best regards, > > Chris Hello Chris Li, I received your mail and have been taking more time to think through the discussion you raised, so I had not replied immediately. Looking back at my proposals, I realized I kept sending out questions as I was trying to align fully with your view and bring things up to patch level quality. Considering you also have many other topics to think about, I will take some time to review this subject myself and focus on reducing communication overhead. Over the past week you have been quick to review and very engaged, which I greatly appreciate. I feel happy that our ideation has aligned to a good extent, and my frequent questions came from being motivated to bring this up to the same level of patch work as before as quickly as possible. In hindsight, I realize this also reflected my own impatience. I am also in the process of clarifying my thoughts by working out the aligned parts at the code level. At the same time, I am considering how this connects with the points we have discussed so far and the areas where alignment is still incomplete. Once my thoughts on your last review settle, I will send you my ideas and any remaining questions. (almost done!) Thank you again for your thoughtful reviews, and the respect I have for your guidance throughout this discussion. Best regards, Youngjun Park