From: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>, <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <kernel-team@meta.com>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<jackmanb@google.com>, <jannh@google.com>, <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
<andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>,
<mingo@kernel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
<baolu.lu@intel.com>, <david.guckian@intel.com>,
<damian.muszynski@intel.com>
Subject: [BUG] x86/mm: regression after 4a02ed8e1cc3
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 16:44:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLcQ3UCXXNcByW1O@gcabiddu-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226030129.530345-2-riel@surriel.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:00:36PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Reduce code duplication by consolidating the decision point
> for whether to do individual invalidations or a full flush
> inside get_flush_tlb_info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
> ---
After 4a02ed8e1cc3 ("x86/mm: Consolidate full flush threshold
decision"), we've seen data corruption in DMAd buffers when testing SVA.
From our preliminary analysis, it appears that get_flush_tlb_info()
modifies the start and end parameters for full TLB flushes (setting
start=0, end=TLB_FLUSH_ALL). However, the MMU notifier call at the end
of the function still uses the original parameters instead of the
updated info->start and info->end.
The change below appears to solve the problem, however we are not sure if
this is the right way to fix the problem.
----8<----
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 39f80111e6f1..e66c7662c254 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -1459,7 +1459,7 @@ void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
put_flush_tlb_info();
put_cpu();
- mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, start, end);
+ mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, info->start, info->end);
}
static void do_flush_tlb_all(void *info)
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 3:00 [PATCH v14 00/13] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 01/13] x86/mm: consolidate full flush threshold decision Rik van Riel
2025-09-02 15:44 ` Giovanni Cabiddu [this message]
2025-09-02 15:50 ` [BUG] x86/mm: regression after 4a02ed8e1cc3 Dave Hansen
2025-09-02 16:08 ` Nadav Amit
2025-09-02 16:11 ` Dave Hansen
2025-09-03 14:00 ` Rik van Riel
2025-09-02 16:05 ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:13 ` Jann Horn
2025-09-03 14:18 ` Nadav Amit
2025-09-03 14:42 ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:31 ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:57 ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 02/13] x86/mm: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 16:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 19:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 03/13] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 18:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 18:51 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 19:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 18:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-03 19:23 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:10 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 16:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 16:57 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 21:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 04/13] x86/mm: use INVLPGB for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 19:00 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 21:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 05/13] x86/mm: use INVLPGB in flush_tlb_all Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 19:18 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-01 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-01 15:54 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 22:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 06/13] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 18:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 07/13] x86/mm: add global ASID allocation helper functions Rik van Riel
2025-03-02 7:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 08/13] x86/mm: global ASID context switch & TLB flush handling Rik van Riel
2025-03-02 7:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 09/13] x86/mm: global ASID process exit helpers Rik van Riel
2025-03-02 12:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-02 13:53 ` Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 10/13] x86/mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for multi-threaded processes Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 10:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 11/13] x86/mm: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 11:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 21:47 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:24 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 12:52 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-04 14:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:33 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-04 17:51 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 12/13] x86/mm: enable AMD translation cache extensions Rik van Riel
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 13/13] x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 22:40 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 12:42 ` [PATCH v14 00/13] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 13:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 12:04 ` [PATCH] x86/mm: Always set the ASID valid bit for the INVLPGB instruction Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 12:43 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLcQ3UCXXNcByW1O@gcabiddu-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com \
--cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=damian.muszynski@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.guckian@intel.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox