linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: mm: fully support nested lazy_mmu sections
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 10:30:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aL6iNW8sOkSaT4KE@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250908073931.4159362-4-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>

On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 08:39:27AM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> Despite recent efforts to prevent lazy_mmu sections from nesting, it
> remains difficult to ensure that it never occurs - and in fact it
> does occur on arm64 in certain situations (CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC).
> Commit 1ef3095b1405 ("arm64/mm: Permit lazy_mmu_mode to be nested")
> made nesting tolerable on arm64, but without truly supporting it:
> the inner leave() call clears TIF_LAZY_MMU, disabling the batching
> optimisation before the outer section ends.
>
> Now that the lazy_mmu API allows enter() to pass through a state to
> the matching leave() call, we can actually support nesting. If
> enter() is called inside an active lazy_mmu section, TIF_LAZY_MMU
> will already be set, and we can then return LAZY_MMU_NESTED to
> instruct the matching leave() call not to clear TIF_LAZY_MMU.
>
> The only effect of this patch is to ensure that TIF_LAZY_MMU (and
> therefore the batching optimisation) remains set until the outermost
> lazy_mmu section ends. leave() still emits barriers if needed,
> regardless of the nesting level, as the caller may expect any
> page table changes to become visible when leave() returns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 19 +++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 816197d08165..602feda97dc4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -85,24 +85,14 @@ typedef int lazy_mmu_state_t;
>
>  static inline lazy_mmu_state_t arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
>  {
> -	/*
> -	 * lazy_mmu_mode is not supposed to permit nesting. But in practice this
> -	 * does happen with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, where a page allocation
> -	 * inside a lazy_mmu_mode section (such as zap_pte_range()) will change
> -	 * permissions on the linear map with apply_to_page_range(), which
> -	 * re-enters lazy_mmu_mode. So we tolerate nesting in our
> -	 * implementation. The first call to arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() will
> -	 * flush and clear the flag such that the remainder of the work in the
> -	 * outer nest behaves as if outside of lazy mmu mode. This is safe and
> -	 * keeps tracking simple.
> -	 */
> +	int lazy_mmu_nested;
>
>  	if (in_interrupt())
>  		return LAZY_MMU_DEFAULT;
>
> -	set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
> +	lazy_mmu_nested = test_and_set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
>
> -	return LAZY_MMU_DEFAULT;
> +	return lazy_mmu_nested ? LAZY_MMU_NESTED : LAZY_MMU_DEFAULT;
>  }
>
>  static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(lazy_mmu_state_t state)
> @@ -113,7 +103,8 @@ static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(lazy_mmu_state_t state)
>  	if (test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING))
>  		emit_pte_barriers();
>
> -	clear_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
> +	if (state != LAZY_MMU_NESTED)
> +		clear_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
>  }
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> --
> 2.47.0
>

--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-08  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-08  7:39 [PATCH v2 0/7] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-08  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: remove arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-08  9:29   ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-09  9:00   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-08  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm: introduce local state for lazy_mmu sections Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-08  9:30   ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-09  5:40   ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-09  9:05     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-09  9:07   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-09  9:40     ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-09 10:09       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-09 11:45         ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-09 11:54           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-09 13:49             ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-09 14:02               ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-09 14:28               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-10 15:16                 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-10 15:37                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-11 16:19                     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-11 18:14                       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-12  7:26                         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-12  8:04                           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-12  8:48                             ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-12  8:55                               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-12 12:37                                 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-12 12:40                                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-12 12:56                                     ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-12 13:02                                       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-12 14:05                                         ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-12 14:25                                           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-12 15:02                                             ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-09 14:38               ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-10 16:11                 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-11 12:06                   ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-11 16:20                     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-09 10:57     ` Juergen Gross
2025-09-09 14:15       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-09 10:08   ` Jürgen Groß
2025-09-08  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: mm: fully support nested " Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-08  9:30   ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-09-08  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] x86/xen: support nested lazy_mmu sections (again) Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-09  9:13   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-09  9:37     ` Jürgen Groß
2025-09-09  9:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-09 11:28         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-09  9:42   ` Jürgen Groß
2025-09-08  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] powerpc/mm: support nested lazy_mmu sections Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-08  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-08  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: update lazy_mmu documentation Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-08  9:30   ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-09  9:10   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-09  2:16 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-09  9:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-09 13:59     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-12 15:25     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-15  6:28       ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-15 11:19         ` Kevin Brodsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aL6iNW8sOkSaT4KE@e129823.arm.com \
    --to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox