From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Weilin Tong <tongweilin@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
surenb@google.com, jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
ziy@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Use pr_warn_once() for min_free_kbytes warning
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:45:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aK_7GKJ4BWjye4tZ@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828030602.204332-1-tongweilin@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu 28-08-25 11:06:02, Weilin Tong wrote:
> When min_free_kbytes is user-configured, increasing system memory via memory
> hotplug may trigger multiple recalculations of min_free_kbytes. This results
> in excessive warning messages flooding the kernel log if several memory blocks
> are added in a short period.
>
> Sample dmesg output before optimization:
> ...
> [ 1303.897214] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> [ 1303.960498] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> [ 1303.970116] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> [ 1303.979709] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> [ 1303.989254] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> [ 1303.999122] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> [ 1304.008644] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> [ 1304.018537] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> [ 1304.028054] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> [ 1304.037615] min_free_kbytes is not updated to 126529 because user defined value 1048576 is preferred
> ...
>
> Replace pr_warn() with pr_warn_once() to ensure only one warning is printed,
> preventing large volumes of repeated log entries and improving log readability.
pr_warn_once seems too aggressive as we could miss useful events. On the
other hand I agree that repeating the same message for each memory block
onlining is not really helpful. Would it make sense to only pr_warn when
new_min_free_kbytes differs from the previous one we have warned for?
>
> Signed-off-by: Weilin Tong <tongweilin@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index baead29b3e67..774723150e5b 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -6412,7 +6412,7 @@ void calculate_min_free_kbytes(void)
> if (new_min_free_kbytes > user_min_free_kbytes)
> min_free_kbytes = clamp(new_min_free_kbytes, 128, 262144);
> else
> - pr_warn("min_free_kbytes is not updated to %d because user defined value %d is preferred\n",
> + pr_warn_once("min_free_kbytes is not updated to %d because user defined value %d is preferred\n",
> new_min_free_kbytes, user_min_free_kbytes);
>
> }
> --
> 2.43.7
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 3:06 Weilin Tong
2025-08-28 6:45 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2025-08-28 9:23 ` Weilin Tong
2025-08-28 9:40 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-28 9:48 ` Weilin Tong
2025-08-28 10:09 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-28 10:30 ` Weilin Tong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aK_7GKJ4BWjye4tZ@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tongweilin@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox