From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Bijan Tabatabai <bijan311@gmail.com>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@redhat.com, ziy@nvidia.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
bijantabatab@micron.com, venkataravis@micron.com,
emirakhur@micron.com, ajayjoshi@micron.com,
vtavarespetr@micron.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] mm/damon/paddr: Allow interleaving in migrate_{hot,cold} actions
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 14:28:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFmq5Y1zKov9__zh@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620202155.98021-1-sj@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 01:21:55PM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Bijan,
>
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:04:56 -0500 Bijan Tabatabai <bijan311@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
> > This patch set adds the mechanism for dynamically changing how application
> > data is interleaved across nodes while leaving the policy of what the
> > interleave weights should be to userspace. It does this by modifying the
> > migrate_{hot,cold} DAMOS actions to allow passing in a list of migration
> > targets to their target_nid parameter. When this is done, the
> > migrate_{hot,cold} actions will migrate pages between the specified nodes
> > using the global interleave weights found at
> > /sys/kernel/mm/mempolicy/weighted_interleave/node<N>. This functionality
> > can be used to dynamically adjust how pages are interleaved by changing the
> > global weights. When only a single migration target is passed to
> > target_nid, the migrate_{hot,cold} actions will act the same as before.
>
> This means users are required to manipulate two interfaces. DAMON sysfs for
> target nodes, and weighted_interleave sysfs for weights. I don't think this
> coupling is very ideal.
>
Just tossing this out there - weighted interleave sysfs entries *should*
be automatic, and the preferred weights shouldn't really ever change
over time. Even if they did, if it's the result of devices coming and
going - the updates should also be automatic.
So, in practice, a usually probably only has to twiddle DAMON.
I don't have a strong opinion on whether DAMON should leverage the
mempolicy interface, but I think the way it is designed now is
acceptable.
~Gregory
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 18:04 Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-20 18:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] mm/mempolicy: Expose get_il_weight() to MM Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-23 19:06 ` Gregory Price
2025-06-23 19:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-23 19:38 ` Gregory Price
2025-06-24 10:58 ` Huang, Ying
2025-06-20 18:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mm/damon/paddr: Allow multiple migrate targets Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-21 18:02 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-21 18:11 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 14:08 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-06-23 16:50 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 14:27 ` Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-23 16:52 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 14:16 ` Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-23 17:52 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 23:15 ` Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-24 0:34 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-24 16:01 ` Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-24 22:33 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-20 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] mm/damon/paddr: Allow interleaving in migrate_{hot,cold} actions SeongJae Park
2025-06-20 21:47 ` Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-20 23:13 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-21 17:36 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 14:39 ` Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-23 16:32 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 19:28 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-06-23 23:21 ` Bijan Tabatabai
2025-06-26 19:13 ` Gregory Price
2025-06-23 13:45 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-06-23 14:57 ` Bijan Tabatabai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFmq5Y1zKov9__zh@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=ajayjoshi@micron.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bijan311@gmail.com \
--cc=bijantabatab@micron.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=emirakhur@micron.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=venkataravis@micron.com \
--cc=vtavarespetr@micron.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox