From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>,
Christop Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Kernel crash due to alloc_tag_top_users() being called when !mem_profiling_support?
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:47:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFUgJgrc_eIHRy5-@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFQnEj0UASzl2Lxa@hyeyoo>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:04:50AM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 11:10:43PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 02:25:37PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > for this change, we reported
> > > "[linux-next:master] [lib/test_vmalloc.c] 7fc85b92db: Mem-Info"
> > > in
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202505071555.e757f1e0-lkp@intel.com/
> > >
> > > at that time, we made some tests with x86_64 config which runs well.
> > >
> > > now we noticed the commit is in mainline now.
> >
> > (Re-sending due to not Ccing people and the list...)
> >
> > Hi, I'm facing the same error on my testing environment.
>
> I should have clarified that the reason the kernel failed to allocate
> memory on my machine was due to running out of memory, not because of the
> vmalloc test module.
>
> But based on the fact that the test case (align_shift_alloc_test) is
> expected to fail, the issue here is not memory allocation failure
> itself, but rather that the kernel crashes when the allocation fails.
>
It looks someone tries to test the CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC=y as built-in
approach test-cases. Yes, it will trigger a lot of warnings as some
use cases are supposed to be failed. This will trigger a lot of kernel
warnings which can be considered by test-robot or people as problem.
In this case i can exclude those use cases or even not run at all unless
boot-parameters properly sets if built-in.
--
Uladzislau Rezki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 6:25 [linus:master] [lib/test_vmalloc.c] 2d76e79315: Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Fatal_exception kernel test robot
2025-06-19 14:10 ` Kernel crash due to alloc_tag_top_users() being called when !mem_profiling_support? Harry Yoo
2025-06-19 15:04 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 8:47 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2025-06-22 22:54 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-23 11:29 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-06-19 15:08 ` David Wang
2025-06-20 1:14 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 0:40 ` [PATCH] lib/alloc_tag: do not acquire nonexistent lock when mem profiling is disabled Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 3:09 ` David Wang
2025-06-20 10:40 ` [PATCH] " Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 11:33 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 13:59 ` David Wang
2025-06-20 12:47 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 10:02 ` CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC=y conflict/race with alloc_tag_init David Wang
2025-06-22 22:50 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-23 2:04 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-23 2:45 ` David Wang
2025-06-23 3:16 ` David Wang
2025-06-23 4:39 ` David Wang
2025-06-23 11:36 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-06-23 13:20 ` David Wang
2025-06-20 14:24 ` [PATCH] lib/test_vmalloc.c: demote vmalloc_test_init to late_initcall David Wang
2025-06-20 19:59 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 19:53 ` [PATCH v2] lib/alloc_tag: do not acquire non-existent lock in alloc_tag_top_users() Harry Yoo
2025-06-21 3:43 ` David Wang
2025-06-22 22:24 ` [PATCH " Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-23 2:01 ` Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFUgJgrc_eIHRy5-@pc636 \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox