linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>,
	Christop Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Kernel crash due to alloc_tag_top_users() being called when !mem_profiling_support?
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:47:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFUgJgrc_eIHRy5-@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFQnEj0UASzl2Lxa@hyeyoo>

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:04:50AM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 11:10:43PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 02:25:37PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > for this change, we reported
> > > "[linux-next:master] [lib/test_vmalloc.c]  7fc85b92db: Mem-Info"
> > > in
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202505071555.e757f1e0-lkp@intel.com/
> > > 
> > > at that time, we made some tests with x86_64 config which runs well.
> > > 
> > > now we noticed the commit is in mainline now.
> > 
> > (Re-sending due to not Ccing people and the list...)
> > 
> > Hi, I'm facing the same error on my testing environment.
> 
> I should have clarified that the reason the kernel failed to allocate
> memory on my machine was due to running out of memory, not because of the
> vmalloc test module.
> 
> But based on the fact that the test case (align_shift_alloc_test) is
> expected to fail, the issue here is not memory allocation failure
> itself, but rather that the kernel crashes when the allocation fails.
> 
It looks someone tries to test the CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC=y as built-in
approach test-cases. Yes, it will trigger a lot of warnings as some
use cases are supposed to be failed. This will trigger a lot of kernel
warnings which can be considered by test-robot or people as problem.

In this case i can exclude those use cases or even not run at all unless
boot-parameters properly sets if built-in.

--
Uladzislau Rezki


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-20  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18  6:25 [linus:master] [lib/test_vmalloc.c] 2d76e79315: Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Fatal_exception kernel test robot
2025-06-19 14:10 ` Kernel crash due to alloc_tag_top_users() being called when !mem_profiling_support? Harry Yoo
2025-06-19 15:04   ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20  8:47     ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2025-06-22 22:54       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-23 11:29         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-06-19 15:08   ` David Wang
2025-06-20  1:14     ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20  0:40 ` [PATCH] lib/alloc_tag: do not acquire nonexistent lock when mem profiling is disabled Harry Yoo
2025-06-20  3:09   ` David Wang
2025-06-20 10:40     ` [PATCH] " Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 11:33       ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 13:59         ` David Wang
2025-06-20 12:47       ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 10:02 ` CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC=y conflict/race with alloc_tag_init David Wang
2025-06-22 22:50   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-23  2:04     ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-23  2:45     ` David Wang
2025-06-23  3:16       ` David Wang
2025-06-23  4:39         ` David Wang
2025-06-23 11:36       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-06-23 13:20         ` David Wang
2025-06-20 14:24 ` [PATCH] lib/test_vmalloc.c: demote vmalloc_test_init to late_initcall David Wang
2025-06-20 19:59   ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-20 19:53 ` [PATCH v2] lib/alloc_tag: do not acquire non-existent lock in alloc_tag_top_users() Harry Yoo
2025-06-21  3:43   ` David Wang
2025-06-22 22:24     ` [PATCH " Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-23  2:01       ` Harry Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aFUgJgrc_eIHRy5-@pc636 \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox