From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>, Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] mm,memory_hotplug: Implement numa node notifier
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:45:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFADwYs9LcyK5tVn@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <360f2f04-4542-4595-bf36-c45ed10335af@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 10:52:31AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Probably worth checking, to make sure we don't have accidental bugs in there
> ...
I did a quick sweep, and we should be cool since users of the node notifier
don't really use *_CANCEL* action. Only ADDED/REMOVED.
Now, users of memory notifier is a different story.
E.g: page_ext will call offline_page_ext to mark the section->page_ext invalid.
online_page_ext does:
base = alloc_page_ext(table_size, nid);
section->page_ext = (void *)base - page_ext_size * pfn;
This is fine, I think, offline_page_ext will not mark it as INVALID because
section->page_ext is NULL, so we just skip it.
This is just one example. I checked some others like kasan and hyperv and they
seem fine.
And anyway, the we could already hit this situation with MEM_* notifiers, so
nothing new.
I'll just make sure to document it so new users take this into account.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-16 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 9:21 [PATCH v6 00/10] " Oscar Salvador
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] mm,slub: Do not special case N_NORMAL nodes for slab_nodes Oscar Salvador
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] mm,memory_hotplug: Remove status_change_nid_normal and update documentation Oscar Salvador
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] mm,memory_hotplug: Implement numa node notifier Oscar Salvador
2025-06-10 8:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-16 8:30 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-16 8:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-16 8:50 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-16 8:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-16 11:45 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2025-06-16 12:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-16 12:32 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-16 12:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-16 12:55 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] mm,slub: Use node-notifier instead of memory-notifier Oscar Salvador
2025-06-10 7:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] mm,memory-tiers: " Oscar Salvador
2025-06-10 7:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] drivers,cxl: " Oscar Salvador
2025-06-10 7:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] drivers,hmat: " Oscar Salvador
2025-06-10 7:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] kernel,cpuset: " Oscar Salvador
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] mm,mempolicy: " Oscar Salvador
2025-06-10 7:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-09 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] mm,memory_hotplug: Drop status_change_nid parameter from memory_notify Oscar Salvador
2025-06-10 7:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-10 8:02 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFADwYs9LcyK5tVn@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox