From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ujwal Kundur <ujwal.kundur@gmail.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
shuah@kernel.org, jackmanb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: Reduce uffd-unit-test poison test to minimum
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 14:28:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF2RSsjuEOtzXcUa@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHvVchZHQCQnO48Q3OhTPYncZdXSoBc1CK-CHz_XAOO+CL9gA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:32:20AM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 8:01 AM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > The test will still generate quite some unwanted MCE error messages to
> > syslog. There was old proposal ratelimiting the MCE messages from kernel,
> > but that has risk of hiding real useful information on production systems.
> >
> > We can at least reduce the test to minimum to not over-pollute dmesg,
> > however trying to not lose its coverage too much.
> >
> > Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>
> Besides a small nitpick you can take:
>
> Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Thanks, Axel.
>
> Making the functional tests small makes sense to me, especially for
> poisoning. Only reason to use a huge number of pages is if we're
> trying to stress racy bugs or so, but really for that you'd want even
> more pages / more threads / run for a longer time. It makes sense to
> separate that use case out / maybe not run it by default, and leave
> the functional tests small + fast.
IIUC the major complain from others are the pollutions in the dmesg. And
yes, it's also slow and IIUC it's because of the messages piped, at least
when I ran it in VMs with a serial console.
>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> > index c73fd5d455c8..39b3fd1b7bf2 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> > @@ -1027,6 +1027,9 @@ static void uffd_poison_handle_fault(
> > do_uffdio_poison(uffd, offset);
> > }
> >
> > +/* Make sure to cover odd/even, and minimum duplications */
> > +#define UFFD_POISON_TEST_NPAGES 4
> > +
> > static void uffd_poison_test(uffd_test_args_t *targs)
> > {
> > pthread_t uffd_mon;
> > @@ -1034,12 +1037,17 @@ static void uffd_poison_test(uffd_test_args_t *targs)
> > struct uffd_args args = { 0 };
> > struct sigaction act = { 0 };
> > unsigned long nr_sigbus = 0;
> > - unsigned long nr;
> > + unsigned long nr, poison_pages = UFFD_POISON_TEST_NPAGES;
> > +
> > + if (nr_pages < poison_pages) {
> > + uffd_test_skip("Too less pages for POISON test");
>
> I think "Too few pages for POISON test" is more grammatically correct.
Right.. This is currently in mm-unstable. Andrew, would you mind take
below as a fixup? TIA!
===8<===
commit 810f5674e1b990775600ffca533dbf75505adbef (HEAD -> test-poison)
Author: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 26 14:22:21 2025 -0400
fixup! selftests/mm: reduce uffd-unit-test poison test to minimum
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
index 39b3fd1b7bf2..50501b38e34e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
@@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static void uffd_poison_test(uffd_test_args_t *targs)
unsigned long nr, poison_pages = UFFD_POISON_TEST_NPAGES;
if (nr_pages < poison_pages) {
- uffd_test_skip("Too less pages for POISON test");
+ uffd_test_skip("Too few pages for POISON test");
return;
}
--
Peter Xu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 15:00 Peter Xu
2025-06-26 17:32 ` Axel Rasmussen
2025-06-26 18:28 ` Peter Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF2RSsjuEOtzXcUa@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ujwal.kundur@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox