From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Em Sharnoff <sharnoff@neon.tech>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Oleg Vasilev <oleg@neon.tech>,
Arthur Petukhovsky <arthur@neon.tech>,
Stefan Radig <stefan@neon.tech>, Misha Sakhnov <misha@neon.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Handle alloc failure in phys_*_init()
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:36:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEE6_S2a-1tk1dtI@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f4c0972-a123-4cc3-89f2-ed3490371e65@neon.tech>
* Em Sharnoff <sharnoff@neon.tech> wrote:
> tl;dr:
>
> * When setting up page table mappings for physical addresses after boot,
> alloc_low_page() uses GFP_ATOMIC, which is allowed to fail.
> * This isn't currently handled, and results in a null pointer
> dereference when it occurs.
> * This allocation failure can happen during memory hotplug.
>
> To handle failure, change phys_pud_init() and similar functions to
> return zero if allocation failed (either directly or transitively), and
> convert that to -ENOMEM in arch_add_memory().
> + /*
> + * Bail only after updating pgd/p4d to keep progress from p4d across retries.
> + */
> + if (!paddr_last)
> + return 0;
> +
> pgd_changed = true;
> - init_memory_mapping(start, start + size, params->pgprot);
> + if (!init_memory_mapping(start, start + size, params->pgprot))
> + return -ENOMEM;
I agree that it makes total sense to fix all this (especially since you
are actively triggering it), but have you tried also changing it away
from GFP_ATOMIC? There's no real reason why it should be GFP_ATOMIC
AFAICS, other than some historic inertia that nobody bothered to fix.
Plus, could you please change the return flow from this zero
special-case over to something like ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) and IS_ERR()?
*Technically* zero is a valid physical address, although we
intentionally never use it in the kernel AFAIK and wouldn't ever put a
page table there either. ERR_PTR()/IS_ERR() is much easier on the eyes
than the zero special-case.
Finally, could you make this a 2-patch fix series: first one to fix the
error return path to not crash, and the second one to change it away
from GFP_ATOMIC?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-04 18:59 Em Sharnoff
2025-06-05 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-06-05 6:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-06-05 6:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-06-09 10:36 ` Em Sharnoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEE6_S2a-1tk1dtI@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=arthur@neon.tech \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=misha@neon.tech \
--cc=oleg@neon.tech \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=sharnoff@neon.tech \
--cc=stefan@neon.tech \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox