From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Cc: gourry@gourry.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
honggyu.kim@sk.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rakie.kim@sk.com, rafael@kernel.org,
lenb@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
horen.chuang@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 15:38:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aC3XTsCknvx2z-u_@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520141236.2987309-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 07:12:35AM -0700, Joshua Hahn wrote:
> On machines with multiple memory nodes, interleaving page allocations
> across nodes allows for better utilization of each node's bandwidth.
> Previous work by Gregory Price [1] introduced weighted interleave, which
> allowed for pages to be allocated across nodes according to user-set ratios.
>
> Ideally, these weights should be proportional to their bandwidth, so
> that under bandwidth pressure, each node uses its maximal efficient
> bandwidth and prevents latency from increasing exponentially.
>
> Previously, weighted interleave's default weights were just 1s -- which
> would be equivalent to the (unweighted) interleave mempolicy, which goes
> through the nodes in a round-robin fashion, ignoring bandwidth information.
>
> This patch has two main goals:
> First, it makes weighted interleave easier to use for users who wish to
> relieve bandwidth pressure when using nodes with varying bandwidth (CXL).
> By providing a set of "real" default weights that just work out of the
> box, users who might not have the capability (or wish to) perform
> experimentation to find the most optimal weights for their system can
> still take advantage of bandwidth-informed weighted interleave.
>
> Second, it allows for weighted interleave to dynamically adjust to
> hotplugged memory with new bandwidth information. Instead of manually
> updating node weights every time new bandwidth information is reported
> or taken off, weighted interleave adjusts and provides a new set of
> default weights for weighted interleave to use when there is a change
> in bandwidth information.
>
> To meet these goals, this patch introduces an auto-configuration mode
> for the interleave weights that provides a reasonable set of default
> weights, calculated using bandwidth data reported by the system. In auto
> mode, weights are dynamically adjusted based on whatever the current
> bandwidth information reports (and responds to hotplug events).
>
> This patch still supports users manually writing weights into the nodeN
> sysfs interface by entering into manual mode. When a user enters manual
> mode, the system stops dynamically updating any of the node weights,
> even during hotplug events that shift the optimal weight distribution.
>
> A new sysfs interface "auto" is introduced, which allows users to switch
> between the auto (writing 1 or Y) and manual (writing 0 or N) modes. The
> system also automatically enters manual mode when a nodeN interface is
> manually written to.
>
> There is one functional change that this patch makes to the existing
> weighted_interleave ABI: previously, writing 0 directly to a nodeN
> interface was said to reset the weight to the system default. Before
> this patch, the default for all weights were 1, which meant that writing
> 0 and 1 were functionally equivalent. With this patch, writing 0 is invalid.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240202170238.90004-1-gregory.price@memverge.com/
>
> Suggested-by: Yunjeong Mun <yunjeong.mun@sk.com>
> Suggested-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Suggested-by: Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Suggested-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> Tested-by: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
> Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Co-developed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 14:12 Joshua Hahn
2025-05-20 17:53 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-20 18:11 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-20 18:37 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-20 19:00 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-21 13:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 15:37 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-21 15:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 13:38 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aC3XTsCknvx2z-u_@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=horen.chuang@linux.dev \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox