From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
mhocko@suse.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, andrii@kernel.org,
memxor@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 09:31:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBqp1ScxaTznSf36@harry> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d3e5d4b-502b-459b-9779-c0bf55ef2a03@suse.cz>
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 02:01:48PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 5/1/25 05:27, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> >
> > kmalloc_nolock() relies on ability of local_lock to detect the situation
> > when it's locked.
> > In !PREEMPT_RT local_lock_is_locked() is true only when NMI happened in
> > irq saved region that protects _that specific_ per-cpu kmem_cache_cpu.
> > In that case retry the operation in a different kmalloc bucket.
> > The second attempt will likely succeed, since this cpu locked
> > different kmem_cache_cpu.
> > When lock_local_is_locked() sees locked memcg_stock.stock_lock
> > fallback to atomic operations.
> >
> > Similarly, in PREEMPT_RT local_lock_is_locked() returns true when
> > per-cpu rt_spin_lock is locked by current task. In this case re-entrance
> > into the same kmalloc bucket is unsafe, and kmalloc_nolock() tries
> > a different bucket that is most likely is not locked by current
> > task. Though it may be locked by a different task it's safe to
> > rt_spin_lock() on it.
> >
> > Similar to alloc_pages_nolock() the kmalloc_nolock() returns NULL
> > immediately if called from hard irq or NMI in PREEMPT_RT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
>
... snip ...
> > @@ -4354,6 +4406,88 @@ void *__kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmalloc_noprof);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * kmalloc_nolock - Allocate an object of given size from any context.
> > + * @size: size to allocate
> > + * @gfp_flags: GFP flags. Only __GFP_ACCOUNT, __GFP_ZERO allowed.
> > + * @node: node number of the target node.
> > + *
> > + * Return: pointer to the new object or NULL in case of error.
> > + * NULL does not mean EBUSY or EAGAIN. It means ENOMEM.
> > + * There is no reason to call it again and expect !NULL.
> > + */
> > +void *kmalloc_nolock_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t gfp_flags, int node)
> > +{
> > + gfp_t alloc_gfp = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | gfp_flags;
> > + struct kmem_cache *s;
> > + bool can_retry = true;
> > + void *ret = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> > +
> > + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(gfp_flags & ~(__GFP_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO));
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE))
> > + return NULL;
> > + if (unlikely(!size))
> > + return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
> > +
> > + if (!USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH() && (in_nmi() || in_hardirq()))
> > + /* kmalloc_nolock() in PREEMPT_RT is not supported from irq */
> > + return NULL;
> > +retry:
> > + s = kmalloc_slab(size, NULL, alloc_gfp, _RET_IP_);
>
> The idea of retrying on different bucket is based on wrong assumptions and
> thus won't work as you expect. kmalloc_slab() doesn't select buckets truly
> randomly, but deterministically via hashing from a random per-boot seed and
> the _RET_IP_, as the security hardening goal is to make different kmalloc()
> callsites get different caches with high probability.
It's not retrying with the same size, so I don't think it's relying on any
assumption about random kmalloc caches. (yeah, it wastes some memory if
allocated from the next size bucket)
if (PTR_ERR(ret) == -EBUSY) {
if (can_retry) {
/* pick the next kmalloc bucket */
size = s->object_size + 1;
/*
* Another alternative is to
* if (memcg) alloc_gfp &= ~__GFP_ACCOUNT;
* else if (!memcg) alloc_gfp |= __GFP_ACCOUNT;
* to retry from bucket of the same size.
*/
can_retry = false;
goto retry;
}
ret = NULL;
}
By the way, it doesn't check if a kmalloc cache that can serve
(s->object_size + 1) allocations actually exists, which is not true for
the largest kmalloc cache?
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-07 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-01 3:27 [PATCH 0/6] mm: Reentrant kmalloc Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: Rename try_alloc_pages() to alloc_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 8:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 1:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] locking/local_lock: Expose dep_map in local_trylock_t Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 12:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-06 14:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 1:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-12 13:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 16:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_lock_is_locked() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 12:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 1:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-12 14:56 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 15:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-12 15:23 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_lock_irqsave_check() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07 13:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-12 14:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 17:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-13 6:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 21:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: Allow GFP_ACCOUNT and GFP_COMP to be used in alloc_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 8:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 1:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-05 18:46 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-06 0:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 1:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-06 1:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 18:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-06 12:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 0:31 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2025-05-07 2:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07 8:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 2:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07 10:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-09 1:03 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-24 17:13 ` SLAB_NO_CMPXCHG was:: " Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-25 11:38 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-26 20:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBqp1ScxaTznSf36@harry \
--to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox