From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
To: nifan.cxl@gmail.com
Cc: muchun.song@linux.dev, willy@infradead.org, osalvador@suse.de,
mcgrof@kernel.org, a.manzanares@samsung.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>,
Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/hugetlb: Refactor unmap_hugepage_range() to take folio instead of page
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 12:59:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBkYmLOiTZt1sLr_@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250505182345.506888-4-nifan.cxl@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 11:22:42AM -0700, nifan.cxl@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
>
> The function unmap_hugepage_range() has two kinds of users:
> 1) unmap_ref_private(), which passes in the head page of a folio. Since
> unmap_ref_private() already takes folio and there are no other uses
> of the folio struct in the function, it is natural for
> unmap_hugepage_range() to take folio also.
> 2) All other uses, which pass in NULL pointer.
>
> In both cases, we can pass in folio. Refactor unmap_hugepage_range() to
> take folio.
It looks like unmap_ref_private() is the only caller that cares about
passing a particular folio to unmap_hugepage_range(). Is there any
reason we shouldn't drop the folio argument and call
__unmap_hugepage_range() directly?
> Signed-off-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 4 ++--
> mm/hugetlb.c | 7 ++++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 23ebf49c5d6a..f6d5f24e793c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ int move_hugetlb_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *, struct mm_struct *,
> struct vm_area_struct *, struct vm_area_struct *);
> void unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area_struct *,
> - unsigned long, unsigned long, struct page *,
> - zap_flags_t);
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> + struct folio *, zap_flags_t);
> void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 0c2b264a7ab8..c339ffe05556 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -6046,7 +6046,7 @@ void __hugetlb_zap_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> }
>
> void unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page,
> + unsigned long end, struct folio *folio,
> zap_flags_t zap_flags)
> {
> struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> @@ -6058,7 +6058,8 @@ void unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, vma->vm_mm);
>
> - __unmap_hugepage_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, ref_page, zap_flags);
> + __unmap_hugepage_range(&tlb, vma, start, end,
> + &folio->page, zap_flags);
>
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
> tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
> @@ -6116,7 +6117,7 @@ static void unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (!is_vma_resv_set(iter_vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER))
> unmap_hugepage_range(iter_vma, address,
> address + huge_page_size(h),
> - &folio->page, 0);
> + folio, 0);
> }
> i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
> }
> --
> 2.47.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-05 18:22 [PATCH v4 0/4] Let unmap_hugepage_range() and several related functions " nifan.cxl
2025-05-05 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/hugetlb: Pass folio instead of page to unmap_ref_private() nifan.cxl
2025-05-05 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/hugetlb: Refactor unmap_hugepage_range() to take folio instead of page nifan.cxl
2025-05-05 19:59 ` Vishal Moola (Oracle) [this message]
2025-05-28 2:08 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-05 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/hugetlb: Refactor __unmap_hugepage_range() " nifan.cxl
2025-05-05 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/hugetlb: Convert use of struct page to folio in __unmap_hugepage_range() nifan.cxl
2025-05-05 22:03 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBkYmLOiTZt1sLr_@fedora \
--to=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox