From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0409CC3ABAA for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6251B6B0092; Mon, 5 May 2025 10:21:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5AAB36B0093; Mon, 5 May 2025 10:21:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 44CDD6B0095; Mon, 5 May 2025 10:21:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4F36B0092 for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 10:21:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97021CADF7 for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:21:23 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83409066846.04.7E806E3 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B2C180006 for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf06.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=sySoIGMP; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf06.hostedemail.com: domain of kbusch@kernel.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kbusch@kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1746454882; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=ZV1Z2VR14ylgUix5FI+lRqQxmCZ8sNITwbPQ8g/6YZ4=; b=6bTVMMVMNYksbj4V401bwqo60lDLia5zH4CWWBR6SvS9Ec6pQ/MWAzXcXqMarun22XD7vp S+YsNsFrRw0I/RJVpOaCUjjRUsRvg5OxdJ4N7tR34fvT/i509jtJ7EB062Ztu0YyZpRT/A UDdgq/5AJpyH/itpfsIEhk+JgfnTNSc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf06.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=sySoIGMP; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf06.hostedemail.com: domain of kbusch@kernel.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kbusch@kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1746454882; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Nb0FdM1QSbmTm6JN4xOkYulNmTBhIyrU0YkQhlH4s63gpSR08UUWLvZhfRqM4jpkGzWT0q egBn0uJVyh8bapZeEcGQe8MVet9D/lBK0MK9e6ofYJA8zws3Zjgr8Bj6GK7PikSQhWJchm CpLUrnRdlwrifu296CoaxdJ7W40+F+g= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1C75C553D; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72633C4CEEE; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:21:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746454881; bh=ZV1Z2VR14ylgUix5FI+lRqQxmCZ8sNITwbPQ8g/6YZ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sySoIGMPnXUia5gYgjghar7ayTInJeYfRjo2/RniRA41GldkAI2ofuMu+WZG3CAXH JvXuPMjVSMmQnyW+6xyj88pSxOTAN7RDvRMCTVMguHzr+4Vck1CZCanTIpzkKniKHG et31GrPjuani2EXpEvdZY8+Y7L//LHseeLjMc+fUi1idbEC+rV2dta8ZfatCQ5Dwfu 7Dzk7m9RXC4GCBsklFVloFDarYOorTi6RLZy3Ld5mkUoa7Ept3bxn/h9nYDadJcsTH Fvkk1SAmCw+axLL2v+I/vUa206XXCA2FtvC2LanRYViRWuIo1PJ/0kIc09OzVGUXss j1TzuqzhjSpZA== Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 08:21:18 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Caleb Sander Mateos Cc: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Andrew Morton , Kanchan Joshi , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] nvme/pci: PRP list DMA pool partitioning Message-ID: References: <20250426020636.34355-1-csander@purestorage.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Stat-Signature: hx7xhmcrj7sohzwgdxod5jquzbgkubyq X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 50B2C180006 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-HE-Tag: 1746454882-843099 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX19h3CDyVSkzsqTfsuuAwqToqG1TGNvdZbgO3jRUC0FDNx6SrQACWDNRzMWRwhUVcaIbtQCt7WM2s52e/DjzbhBIaSO3MGNSWE4BM+aItjw9oOk1AqbAKwKKQg38HixqANQ8598m4xYhw90KWivC2NqAHBBTS9uuO2xwOCaZzcO532MXBYrymCnHzCSYVjDCuOC/F6NdiC26i1qApudvBseZkyTXXHiTTBTmpcvTH+G1OG2aWRlqOXFQX4C9O5NoeeD9m6mGiA+/KTdeA5iHX66KVQwXGOkVXKbwNQ0zKqq9/j4yI04bCOspl7dR87kqJr28G/HWxtWConPVvvdH55gr6vGJhOZTtHdQJnqf073aScNB4FauIjm5luPRvaoZQBptgsmais2AKGKlh4XBy3jWBUd/txP2QiSHAjJmMJsBjCKrEfvqYAbRbc9nb5MgxIH4jqTKtCzArdA6UI/iuRKsQ9NHefJAuwTm9IKhVZCj2voc+fbDDPTTuKGAVZ/fbmRsgG9ovlx5HLpIiUuFLMHaTDkMZiI/gOz33eWcfKVc99rcRXeN1wSRpPbGi+G/uHLeyG9gfzMKzUthu4kPAijIHDKvVEKJcMXJHHZ5D4dFBTGXnp5X/MnPd+N2Wyf98vAmj+uoAQQV9wetrF9JoDki1C3CvcQOnb5BN4O8ofpJvyOEx9EyNoNOGDQEk9BK+bP0Dfe88EfTDLcYI9oIDD2nRbMgMB1Xx43bAI7Uqq1Vgvvi1AqvN3TcQEJ4w87fl9h5jCHeZk7aYm9GIrz1aoWZN7DrpbGesktG26M986UqWcjxWtmwopLbuxY/i0AgH6b1ZVsUoOF+uY/K0YAt/BHERKsfQ27aBHxayJZkuJCLPcQsqeDbi+/e1L2cYn9n9nonT2hmqEVF+RYKSaQk2pDSRRwM9iY1WEGmimE5a7nGcG2oxkAPxQnKd43vitXM0MFGwFxH2PM +N6B662g ZoX6cC4KbSR9O+Jp+XR4R/AN3ZjDk4DQT/ygJmKD8HpNoA1VTGEBJhjXZbW585WEHZHIlZjWL4eWY60aR7PA7m/z16dRQxwBZ9/J1WTfKWlA6e+r4v8IErzseR5BvztOShgLq2KBwHQBoq7RCfT9UxV4L8Q4/RQD5lKF4SR86jaLu8dgb8dkkp1APV9KJTS2QGr94yI7qJubcYAXzXbGAtqaVQl5U7G1OQg1K5fqXcQ7riB5RRXMItUPc/RwQZ+8BKzG/ X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:48:17AM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: > It seems like there is consensus on this series and all patches have > multiple reviews. Would it be possible to queue it up for 6.16? The > NVMe tree seems like it would make sense, though maybe the dmapool > patch needs to go through the mm tree? The subsequent nvme patches depend on the dmapool patch, so they all need to go through the same tree. It's okay with me if nvme picks these up, but I think we need an Ack from one of the mm reviewers/maintainers.